Updated August 28, 2026 · 17 min read · by Eric Lindquist
Kalshi has a board up that asks the question crypto holders have been dodging since February: which of these coins actually finishes 2026 in the green? There are 10 contracts, one each for Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, XRP, Dogecoin, Chainlink, Litecoin, Stellar Lumens, Polkadot and Shiba Inu. Each one pays $1 if that coin's calendar-year return comes out positive, and nothing at all if it does not.
Then there is the fact that turns it from a formality into a real question. As of 6:53 PM ET on Friday, August 28, every single one of the 10 was trading below the price it opened the year at. All of them, after the fastest week this market has had all year.
We pulled the whole board, hid every price from a panel of AI models whose calls we grade in public, gave them the same fetched evidence, and asked each one to score all 10 coins cold. One contract came back rated far higher than everything else on the board, and it is not Bitcoin.
Why Every Contract On This Board Starts From Behind
The settlement language is short enough to quote in full. Kalshi's rule on the Bitcoin contract reads: "If Bitcoin has a positive return in 2026, then the market resolves to Yes." The other nine say the same thing with a different name in the sentence.
If none of that sounds like a bet you have placed before, our explainer on how a prediction market turns a question into a price is the 5-minute version. The word doing all the work here is return. Kalshi's contract terms define it as the last price of the period minus the first price of the period, divided by the first price. The first price here is the opening print of 2026, back on January 1, and nothing between then and the close of the year counts. A coin can spend the whole autumn above its January line and still resolve No if it slips back before December 31, and one that spends the autumn below can still resolve Yes by getting there on the final day.
Every contract here asks the same question: does this coin finish December 31 above the price it opened January 1 at? The terms close the obvious loophole in one line: "A Return of zero is not a positive return."
There is one oddity in the paperwork. The terms document names nine eligible cryptocurrencies and Solana is not among them, yet Kalshi lists and quotes a Solana contract on this event alongside the other nine. The exchange's live market rules settle it either way; the gap between the document and the board is a difference worth noting, not a rule anyone can act on.
Prices come from CF Benchmarks, named as the source agency on the series. Each minute is a trimmed average of that minute's index prints, throwing out the top and bottom 20% of values, which is a small detail that stops one bad tick from settling a market. The board settles on that CF Benchmarks index rather than on any single exchange's screen, so the Coinbase figures throughout this piece are a close proxy and not the settlement number itself. Trading closes at 10:00 AM ET on January 1, 2027, reading the full 2026 year.
Costs matter here more than usual, because some of the books below are very wide. Kalshi's trading fee scales with the price of the contract, and our breakdown of what a Kalshi trade actually costs has the arithmetic.
The starting-line rule is why a coin can be having a good month and still be a long shot here. Litecoin is up 8.7% over the last 30 days and still needs 55.5% to get back to even. Polkadot needs to more than double.
Free: The Weekly PM Market Brief
The 8-model panel's graded record, the week's biggest market-vs-model gaps, and what's spiking next. One email, Sundays.
Unsubscribe anytime, one click. We never share your email.
New to this kind of market? Our plain-English guide to Kalshi's Bitcoin price markets walks through how a cent price becomes a probability and how these contracts settle.
These are market prices and model estimates, not predictions of fact and not financial advice. Kalshi is a CFTC-regulated event-contract exchange (18+; availability varies by state). Prices on this page carry an "as of" stamp and get re-read when the story moves.
What 2026 Did To These Coins
The year the board is measuring started at the top. Bitcoin set its all-time high of $126,210 on October 6, 2025, and the decline that followed reached 52% peak to trough by the February 2026 lows. The same account puts the turn in late February, when a 15% global tariff announcement "pushed inflation expectations high enough to take rate cuts off the table." Rate-cut expectations had been the fuel; without them, the money went elsewhere.
Spring made it worse. In late May, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs posted a record outflow streak of roughly $2.8 billion across nine sessions, with BlackRock's IBIT alone shedding $527.84 million on May 28. From June into early August, Bitcoin ground sideways between roughly $60,000 and $67,000.
Then August happened. On the 19th the SEC announced proposed rules laying out "a framework for crypto companies to raise capital" and defining two exemptions from registration for crypto-related investment contracts, with a path for mature assets to exit securities classification entirely. Bitcoin was $64,877 that morning. Two days later it printed above $81,000. The Crypto Times measured the run at 23% in a week, from roughly $60,000 to $80,000 between August 17 and 21, and named the catalysts as the Treasury's decision to increase longer-term securities purchases plus the regulatory news. Spot Bitcoin ETFs took in $1.92 billion in the week ending August 21; ether funds added about $697 million, then more than $300 million on each of August 24 and 25.
| 2026 | What happened |
|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2025 | Bitcoin's all-time high, $126,210 |
| Late Feb | A 15% global tariff announcement; rate-cut expectations come off the table |
| Feb Lows | The drawdown reaches 52% from the high |
| Late May | Nine straight sessions of spot Bitcoin ETF outflows, about $2.8 billion |
| June To Early Aug | Bitcoin grinds between roughly $60,000 and $67,000 |
| Aug 19 | The SEC proposes its crypto capital-raising framework |
| Aug 17 To 21 | Bitcoin runs from about $60,000 to $80,000, up 23% on the week |
| Week To Aug 21 | $1.92 billion into spot Bitcoin ETFs, about $697 million into ether funds |
By Thursday's close The Rio Times had Bitcoin at $80,258, Ethereum at $2,510, and Solana up 6.89% at $109.21 after Charles Schwab said it plans to add Solana, Avalanche and Chainlink to Schwab Crypto in the coming months at a fee of 0.75% per transaction. By Friday evening Coinbase had Bitcoin back at $77,729.
Which reading of August is correct is a genuine regime question, and the whole board turns on it. Bitcoin's 21.6% run over the last 30 days is either the start of the recovery or a squeeze that fades.
The Climb Each Coin Has Left
Here is the distance problem in three numbers, all measured against each coin's own opening print of 2026 and its spot price at 6:53 PM ET on August 28.
- Chainlink Needs 6.6%. It is down only 6.2% on the year, the smallest hole on the board, and it has run 37.2% in the last 30 days.
- Bitcoin Needs 12.6%. Down 11.2% on the year, on the board's busiest contract at 143,235 traded.
- Polkadot Needs 110.7%. Down 52.5% on the year, and sitting at 26% of its own 90-day range.
Distance alone undersells the spread, because these coins do not move at the same speed. Measured in each coin's own recent volatility, Chainlink's climb is about a sixth of one standard deviation of ordinary movement between now and New Year's. Bitcoin's is just under half. Polkadot's is two full standard deviations. Put that against what actually happened. Running every 125-day window through Coinbase's daily closes for 2026, Polkadot's best stretch of the year still finished 19.3% down, and Bitcoin's best gained 4.4% against a contract that needs 12.6%. Neither coin has yet done in any four-month window this year what its contract now requires in the four months that are left.
The second structural fact is that these 10 independent contracts are not 10 independent bets. Over the last 90 days, Ethereum's daily moves correlate 0.88 with Bitcoin's, XRP 0.86, Solana 0.84, Chainlink 0.82. Only Stellar Lumens breaks away, at 0.55. Eight of the nine non-Bitcoin contracts sit at 0.65 or higher, which makes a basket of them one macro call held eight times over rather than eight separate wagers.
And the calendar-year record says these things turn together. In 2024, nine of the 10 finished green. In 2025, all 10 finished red. Across every complete calendar year Coinbase has priced for these coins, 31 of 55 came out positive, but they are stacked, not scattered.
The Board
Panel numbers below come from seven AI models that never saw a market price. Each one received the same fetched data card: the binding contract terms, every coin's opening print and spot, the required climb, realized volatility on two windows, momentum and chart levels, the correlation matrix, the full calendar-year ledger, and a dated news record. Each scored all 10 coins in a single pass, then read the other six boards anonymously and revised. The blend is the seat median.
Kalshi quotes are order-book midpoints as of August 28, 2026, 7:06 PM ET, and the rows are in market order, most expensive contract first. Because these contracts are not mutually exclusive, the column does not sum to 100 and is not supposed to.
| Coin | Still needs | Kalshi | Panel |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ripple (XRP) | 33.0% | 35.5¢ | 33% |
| Chainlink (LINK) | 6.6% | 35¢ | 55% |
| Solana (SOL) | 19.7% | 31¢ | 41% |
| Stellar Lumens (XLM) | 12.4% | 20.5¢ | 34% |
| Bitcoin (BTC) | 12.6% | 19¢ | 43% |
| Ethereum (ETH) | 21.5% | 18.5¢ | 41% |
| Shiba Inu (SHIB) | 33.4% | 18.5¢ | 28% |
| Dogecoin (DOGE) | 37.7% | 16¢ | 24% |
| Litecoin (LTC) | 55.5% | 11.5¢ | 8% |
| Polkadot (DOT) | 110.7% | 9.5¢ | 4% |
More live boards from the same panel: the Bitcoin new-high ladder has a return above $100,000 at 22.5¢, the Ethereum ladder has a new 2026 high above $3,500 at 27.5¢, and the Solana board has above $150 at 31¢. Prices fetched August 28, 2026, 7:06 PM ET.
Read the last two columns as a disagreement, never as a recommendation. Sorted by the panel instead, the order changes at the top: Chainlink first at 55%, then Bitcoin at 43%, with XRP dropping to sixth. The market and the panel agree on the shape at the bottom and part company in the middle.
Chainlink: Six Percent From Even, And The Panel's Top Contract
All seven seats gave Chainlink their highest number on the board, from 48% to 62%. No other coin was ranked first by anybody. The reasoning was arithmetic rather than enthusiasm. Chainlink needs about half the climb Bitcoin needs, and roughly a fifth of what Dogecoin needs, which matters because most of what moves any of them is Bitcoin. Chainlink has been moving about 1.18 times as far as Bitcoin on an average day, so its 6.6% hole is roughly a 5.6% Bitcoin move. That is the calculation the seat below is describing.
Forecaster A's beta-adjusted conversion is a sharper framing than my raw sigma read: it shows LINK needs only a 5.6% BTC move versus BTC's own 12.6%, while every other coin needs more BTC than BTC does. — Claude Fable
One coin sits right on that line. Stellar Lumens needs 12.4%, a hair less than Bitcoin's 12.6%, and the panel still put it nine points below Bitcoin at 34%. The reason is the correlation column: at 0.55, Stellar Lumens is the one contract here that does not reliably get carried by a Bitcoin rally, so a short climb buys it less than the same short climb buys Chainlink.
The Schwab listing plan is the one catalyst on the board that belongs to a specific coin rather than the whole class, and it names Chainlink and Solana. Chainlink is quoted 35¢ with a wide 31/39 spread, which is a real cost of entry: at those quotes you pay 39 to get in and receive 31 to get out.
Bitcoin: A Short Climb And The Board's Widest Gap
Bitcoin needs 12.6% in 125 days, and the book on it is 18 bid, 20 ask, a 19¢ midpoint. To read what 20¢ means: a buyer paying the ask puts up $100 for 500 contracts, which return $500 in total if 2026 finishes green, before fees, and nothing if it does not. The panel's median is 43%.
Twenty-four points is the widest gap on the board, and it is worth saying plainly what our own record says about gaps like it. Across 3,762 graded settlements spanning 2,994 markets, this panel loses about 70% of its disagreements with the Kalshi price once the gap reaches 10¢, and about 84% once it reaches 30¢. The worst pocket of all is exactly this shape: the whole panel leaning the same way against the market, because the seats share their errors. The gap is a question worth investigating. It has never been an edge.
What the seats actually argued is that the August catalysts were institutional rather than retail. Treasury duration buying, $1.92 billion of ETF inflows in a week, and a regulatory framework are slower-moving than a short squeeze. The counter-argument, which several seats made against themselves, is the ledger: eight months into a red year, the sign rarely flips by December.
XRP And Solana: Where The Market Pays Up
The panel sits below the market on three rows, and XRP is by far the busiest of them: 33% against 35.5¢, on the tightest book on the board at 35/36. The other two are Litecoin and Polkadot, at the bottom of the table. XRP is also the strangest row here. XRP needs a 33% climb, more than two and a half times Bitcoin's, on the board's second-highest realized volatility at 83% annualized, behind only Shiba Inu's 86%. Buyers pay 16.5¢ more for that than they pay for Bitcoin's much shorter climb.
Solana produced the revision round's clearest split. Of the six seats that revised, two raised Solana after the same Schwab item that lifted Chainlink, one cut it by seven points, and three left it untouched, so the median finished the round exactly where it started, at 41%. Solana carries the board's best 30-day momentum at 41.3% and sits at 87% of its 90-day range.
C and E surfaced a fact I misfiled: the Aug 27 Schwab item names Solana alongside Chainlink, so SOL carries its own catalyst plus the board's best 30-day momentum […]. — Claude Opus
Dark Horses The Panel Won't Dismiss
Litecoin blends at 8%, but Grok priced it at 15% and Claude Opus raised it after the revision round on a specific historical point: a 55.5% four-month run is inside what Litecoin actually did in 2019 and 2024. The record backs the seat. On the same rolling-window count through Coinbase's daily closes, Litecoin's best 125-day stretch was a 319.5% gain in 2019 and a 140.6% gain in 2024, even though the full years finished at 38% and 42%. The catch is the book. Litecoin is quoted 5 bid, 18 ask, the widest spread on the board by a distance, which means the round trip costs more than the contract's whole midpoint.
Polkadot blends at 4% and is the only coin every seat put in single digits except Grok, at 10%. It has finished one of its four complete calendar years green, needs to more than double, and sits near the bottom of its 90-day range. Nobody on the panel found an argument for it, which is itself worth knowing before you read 9.5¢ as cheap.
Every Seat's Number
| Seat | LINK | BTC | ETH | SOL | XLM | XRP | SHIB | DOGE | LTC | DOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable | 48% | 36% | 30% | 33% | 31% | 24% | 22% | 17% | 6% | 3% |
| Claude Opus | 55% | 40% | 33% | 37% | 34% | 27% | 23% | 18% | 8% | 3% |
| Claude Sonnet | 52% | 41% | 38% | 39% | 34% | 33% | 28% | 22% | 8% | 4% |
| ChatGPT | 54% | 43% | 42% | 41% | 32% | 33% | 28% | 24% | 10% | 5% |
| Gemini | 62% | 50% | 45% | 48% | 38% | 42% | 38% | 28% | 10% | 5% |
| Grok | 57% | 49% | 43% | 44% | 38% | 34% | 30% | 26% | 15% | 10% |
| Kimi | 55% | 45% | 41% | 41% | 33% | 30% | 25% | 24% | 7% | 2% |
| Seat Median | 55% | 43% | 41% | 41% | 34% | 33% | 28% | 24% | 8% | 4% |
Every seat on this panel is graded against real market settlements — records to date: Claude Fable 84% on 807 graded calls · Claude Opus 84% on 877 graded calls · Claude Sonnet 82% on 852 graded calls · Gemini 86% on 5,151 graded calls · Grok 84% on 4,427 graded calls · Kimi 82% on 2,576 graded calls. Recomputed daily; the full scoreboard is public.
These are model estimates, not predictions of fact and not financial advice. Seven independent AI models returned a board on this market. Two further seats were unavailable when it ran and are excluded rather than filled in. Six of the seven then completed the revision round; Grok's first-round board stands as its final answer. Every number in this piece gets graded in public once the market settles, and you can read the running results on the full graded scoreboard.
The board traded 658,370 contracts over its lifetime with 185,405 still open, and all 10 contracts have both a bid and an ask, so every quote above is a real two-sided market rather than a displayed one. The spreads are not equal, though: XRP is a penny wide, Litecoin is 13 cents wide.
Where The Panel Changed Its Mind
The revision round is where this panel earns its keep, because the seats have to defend a number against six anonymous critics or move it.
Gemini moved furthest, revising 92 points across the board, with a 24-point cut to Stellar Lumens and an eight-point trim to its own top pick.
I revised my entire board down, accepting B and F's base rate argument that an asset class deep in a red year by late August rarely reverses the sign by December, despite the ETF inflows. Specifically, I drastically cut XLM from 62% to 38% after B and C correctly noted its 0.55 correlation prevents it from reliably riding the macro beta wave, invalidating my round-1 reliance on its raw distance. — Gemini
ChatGPT went the other direction on the tail, cutting six contracts and raising only Chainlink, after a peer converted every required climb into the equivalent Bitcoin move.
I cut DOGE 29 to 24 because 0.82 sigma plus negative 90-day momentum needs a true meme-led alt surge, not just BTC recovering. I cut XRP 37 to 33 because its 1.30 beta still leaves a much taller BTC-equivalent hill than BTC or LINK. — ChatGPT
The most useful revision was the one that did not happen. Claude Opus held Bitcoin at 40% while the first-round boards around it spread from 34 to 60, and said exactly why.
I held BTC at 40 against a 34-60 spread because nobody surfaced a fact, only differing faith in August's durability, and conditional on eight months of red the ledger says class turns rarely flip sign inside four months. — Claude Opus
Claude Sonnet moved a single number, four points, and left the rest alone on the grounds that a peer's cleverer framing that reproduces your existing order is confirmation rather than evidence. Holding for a stated reason is the discipline this round is supposed to enforce.
What Would Change The Panel's Mind
Four things between now and settlement, each one checkable, each with the direction it pushes.
- The SEC's proposed framework moving from proposal to final rule. The August 19 announcement was a proposal with a comment period ahead of it. Adoption pushes every number on this board up; a stalled or narrowed rule pushes them down. The reporting on the proposal read the exit-from-securities path as most likely to benefit mature networks such as Bitcoin and Ethereum, so those two contracts have the most riding on it.
- Spot ETF flows turning negative for a sustained stretch. The week ending August 21 brought in $1.92 billion. A return to the late-May pattern of nine straight outflow sessions would undercut the institutional reading the panel leaned on and cut the majors hard.
- Charles Schwab actually launching Solana, Avalanche and Chainlink. "In the coming months" is not a date. A confirmed launch date lifts Chainlink and Solana specifically. A quiet delay takes back the one coin-specific catalyst on the board.
- Bitcoin reclaiming $87,498 at any point this autumn. The figure is Bitcoin's own January opening print, the exact line its contract has to clear. The first time it trades above that level, the read on this whole board changes, because eight of the nine non-Bitcoin contracts move with Bitcoin at 0.65 or higher.
When This Settles
| Measurement Period | January 1 to December 31, 2026 |
| Settlement Source | CF Benchmarks index, trimmed minute average |
| Final Determination | 10:00 AM ET, January 1, 2027 |
| Next Known Catalysts | SEC comment period on the August 19 proposal; Schwab's Solana, Avalanche and Chainlink launch, dated only as "coming months" |
| As Of | Prices 7:06 PM ET, August 28, 2026; Coinbase spot 6:53 PM ET, August 28, 2026 |
This page gets re-scored when the story moves.
Hottest Prediction Markets Right Now
- 2028 Democratic presidential nominee · $197M traded
- 2027 Pro Football Champion · $73M traded
- 2028 U.S. Presidential Election winner? · $63M traded
- Pro Baseball Champion · $62M traded
- 2028 Republican presidential nominee · $60M traded
- TOUR Championship Winner · $43M traded
Every market above links to our full AI model verdict; browse them all on the OddsShopper prediction markets hub, and see how every settled call actually scored on the full graded scoreboard.
- Where Does Bitcoin End 2026? Kalshi's Price-Band Odds
- How To Play (And Not Get Torched) On Prediction Markets
- How Bitcoin Price Contracts Work On Kalshi
- Is Kalshi Gambling? The Legal Answer And The Honest One
- How Kalshi's Rain Markets Decide It Rained
The Bottom Line
Ten coins, 125 days, and every one of them starting the run from behind its own January line. The market's answer is that almost none of them make it: no midpoint on the board is above 35.5¢, and the two coins facing the biggest climbs are priced for failure. The panel agrees about the bottom of the board and disagrees about the middle, putting Chainlink at 55% on the strength of a 6.6% gap and rating Bitcoin more than twice what the money does.
The honest version is that the panel has been wrong about disagreements like this one about seven times in 10, and we publish that record for exactly this reason. What the two columns agree on is more interesting than where they split: whether any of this resolves green comes down to one question, which is whether August was the turn or just a good week. Everything else on this board is a ranking.
