AL MVP Odds 2026: All 47 Names Scored And Ranked
The Quick Answer
The AL MVP odds 2026 board, scored by the panel: Yordan Álvarez (63%), Ben Rice (12%), Junior Caminero (7%). Every verdict below was made price-blind from live fetched data, and every one gets graded against the real settlement on our scoreboard. The full 47-name board, and where the models split hardest from the crowd's 83-cent favorite, is below.
What The Models Were Given
Free: The Weekly PM Market Brief — the 8-model panel's graded record, the week's biggest market-vs-model gaps, and what's spiking next. One email, Sundays — the signup box is at the bottom of this page, or just keep reading: the record it promises is on this one.
The crowd has made up its mind: Yordan Alvarez trades at 83 cents with under two months of season left. The models were handed the actual AL leaderboards (Alvarez leads home runs, average, OPS, and RBI simultaneously) and asked whether a July lead that dominant deserves August conviction that strong. Their blended answer lands 20 points below the price, which makes this board a referendum on how early is too early to price a coronation.
Each model saw the live AL leaderboards (home runs, average, OPS, RBI) fetched from MLB StatsAPI at generation time. A coverage note told them the tables cover the top of each category, so absence from every table is itself real information; that is how the panel read the names trading on reputation. Eight model seats were asked on every outcome; where a seat's verdict did not return, its table cell shows an em dash and the blend averages the seats that answered.
Where The Machines Split From The Money
Four rows carry most of the money in the Kalshi MLB MVP market right now, and the panel reads each one differently.
Yordan Álvarez: market 83¢, AI blend 63% (20 points below the crowd). Claude Sonnet: "Alvarez leads AL in HR, AVG, OPS, RBI by wide margins with 2 months left—dominant frontrunner but voting/health/team-record risk remain."
Ben Rice: market 2¢, AI blend 12% (10 points above the crowd). Claude Opus: "Rice is a clear second in HR/RBI/OPS but Alvarez dominates every category; Rice needs a fade plus Yankee narrative."
Dillon Dingler: market 4¢, AI blend 1.5% (2.5 points below the crowd). Claude Sonnet: "Dingler appears only twice among leaders (OPS, RBI-tied), far behind Alvarez; catchers rarely win MVP."
Junior Caminero: market 8¢, AI blend 7% (essentially in line with the crowd). GLM 5.2: "Caminero is having a strong season but trails Yordan Alvarez significantly in every major category, making a late MVP surge unlikely."
The Full Board
| Outcome | Kalshi | AI blend | ChatGPT (GPT-5.5) | Claude Fable | Claude Opus | Claude Sonnet | Gemini 3.1 Pro | GLM 5.2 | Kimi K3 | DeepSeek V4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yordan Álvarez | 83¢ | 63% | 62% | 62% | 62% | 55% | 82% | 62% | 55% | 62% |
| Ben Rice | 2¢ | 12% | 13% | 12% | 14% | 12% | 12% | 7% | 13% | 12% |
| Junior Caminero | 8¢ | 7% | 8% | 6% | 10% | 7% | 7% | 4% | 9% | 4% |
| Byron Buxton | 1¢ | 2% | 2% | 3% | 3% | 4% | 1.5% | 2% | 3% | 0.5% |
| Tarik Skubal | 1¢ | 2% | 1.2% | 4% | 5% | 6% | 0.5% | 1.0% | 1.2% | 0.5% |
| Nick Kurtz | 1¢ | 1.9% | 1.5% | 2% | 3% | 3% | 1.5% | 1.0% | 2% | 1.5% |
| Bobby Witt Jr. | 4¢ | 1.9% | 2% | 2% | 2% | 2% | 0.1% | 2% | 4% | 0.5% |
| Aaron Judge | 1¢ | 1.7% | 1.2% | 4% | 2% | 3% | 0.1% | 1.0% | 2% | 0.1% |
| Dillon Dingler | 4¢ | 1.5% | 1.2% | 3% | 1.5% | 0.3% | 1.0% | 1.0% | 2% | 2% |
| José Ramírez | 1¢ | 1.4% | 1.2% | 2% | 2% | 1.0% | 0.2% | 1.5% | 1.0% | 2% |
| Garrett Crochet | 1¢ | 1.4% | 0.4% | 1.5% | 4% | 3% | 0.1% | 0.5% | 1.0% | 0.3% |
| Pete Alonso | 1¢ | 1.3% | 0.6% | 2% | 1.0% | 1.0% | 1.0% | 0.8% | 1.0% | 3% |
| Riley Greene | 1¢ | 1.3% | 1.2% | 2% | 2% | 2% | 1.0% | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.5% |
| Gunnar Henderson | 1¢ | 1.1% | 0.6% | 1.0% | 1.0% | 3% | 0.5% | 1.0% | 1.5% | 0.5% |
| Cal Raleigh | 1¢ | 1.0% | 0.8% | 2% | 2% | 1.0% | 0.1% | 0.5% | 1.2% | 0.1% |
| Vladimir Guerrero Jr. | 1¢ | 0.9% | 0.6% | 1.0% | 1.5% | 1.0% | 0.1% | 1.0% | 1.0% | 1.0% |
| Colson Montgomery | 1¢ | 0.9% | 0.6% | 2% | 1.5% | 1.0% | 1.0% | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.2% |
| Julio Rodríguez | 1¢ | 0.8% | 0.8% | 1.0% | 1.5% | 1.0% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 1.0% | 0.2% |
| Roman Anthony | 1¢ | 0.8% | 0.2% | 1.0% | 2% | 2% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.8% | 0.1% |
| Mike Trout | 1¢ | 0.8% | — | 2% | 1.0% | 1.0% | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.6% | 0.5% |
| Yandy Diaz | 1¢ | 0.7% | 0.3% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 3% | 0.1% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.5% |
| Alejandro Kirk | 1¢ | 0.6% | 0.3% | 1.0% | 1.2% | 1.0% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.6% | 0.1% |
| Jeremy Peña | 1¢ | 0.5% | 0.2% | 1.0% | 1.2% | 1.0% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.2% |
| Jackson Holliday | 1¢ | 0.5% | 0.4% | 1.0% | 0.5% | 1.0% | 0.1% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.5% |
| Corey Seager | 1¢ | 0.5% | 0.6% | 0.4% | 1.0% | 0.8% | 0.1% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.1% |
…plus 22 more names, all under 2% blended
Worked Example: How To Read The Top Row
Take the Álvarez row and walk it left to right. Kalshi has him at 83¢ (the book was quoting 83 bid / 84 ask at this morning's refresh), which is the crowd saying he wins this award about 83 times in 100. The AI blend says 63%, the average of the eight price-blind seats. The spread inside that average is the real information: Gemini 3.1 Pro sits closest to the market at 82%, Claude Sonnet and Kimi hold the skeptical end at 55%, and every other seat lands at 62%. So seven of the eight price-blind seats independently came in 20 or more points under the market. That is not one contrarian model; it is a consensus that the crowd is paying a premium for certainty in a race that still has two months of injury and team-record risk in it.
My read on the gap: the market is pricing what Álvarez has already done; the models are pricing what still has to happen. Both can't be right at settlement, and the scoreboard will say which.
The seat I keep coming back to is Gemini's 82% — the one model that essentially agrees with the crowd. If the blend drifts toward it as the season closes out, the gap was August impatience. If it doesn't, 83¢ was always rich.
Every seat on this panel is graded against real market settlements; that is how our Kalshi AI predictions stay honest. Records as of this page's July 26 generation: GPT 83% on 1,693 graded calls · Claude Fable 85% on 331 graded calls · Claude Opus 86% on 382 graded calls · Claude Sonnet 84% on 363 graded calls · Gemini 85% on 1,718 graded calls · GLM 80% on 1,874 graded calls · Kimi 84% on 1,863 graded calls · DeepSeek 80% on 1,877 graded calls. The full scoreboard recomputes daily and is public.
Model estimates generated July 26, 2026, price-blind. Market prices refreshed August 8, 2026. Each name's contract resolves Yes only if that player wins the 2026 AL MVP, once the award is announced after the season. These are model estimates, not predictions of fact and not financial or trading advice. Models are frequently wrong; the market price reflects real traders' money. Kalshi is a CFTC-regulated exchange; 18+, availability varies by state.
The panel exists for markets our tools don't carry. For the sports they do cover, the free expert picks today hub carries human picks with the reasoning shown.
Related Verdicts
- The NL MVP race, from the same panel
- The AL Cy Young race, scored by the same panel
- The AL pennant board, with the Astros priced team-wide
- The AL West, a three-team coin flip the models scored
- The MLB trade-deadline board, graded Friday
- Every 2026 MLB postseason bracket board, on one page
FAQ
Why do the model percentages differ from the Kalshi price?
The models never see the price. When they disagree with the crowd, one side is wrong, and we grade every verdict against real settlements on our scoreboard.
Are model verdicts betting advice?
No. Model verdicts are model estimates, not betting or financial advice. Treat them as one input among many and make your own decisions.
What data did the models see?
The live AL leaderboards from MLB StatsAPI, and nothing else. Our full methodology, including why absence from those tables was itself a signal, is covered in the What The Models Were Given section above.
Prices on this page are Kalshi's book. If you also trade on the Polymarket US App, code OS4 gets new users a $20 bonus on a $10 deposit — affiliate link; OddsShopper may earn a commission; terms as stated by Polymarket.
18+ Only. Restrictions and eligibility requirements apply. Not available in all jurisdictions. Trading is risky. 100% loss can occur. See polymarket.com/tos for more information. The Polymarket US App serves as an independent software provider and affiliate of Polymarket US and Polymarket Clearing, the CFTC-regulated exchange and clearing organization.
