Updated August 18, 2026 · 9 min read · by Jake Hari. Panel verdicts were generated August 18, price-blind, from 2026 Vegas win totals and verified offseason quarterback moves.
There is a market for almost everything now, including the race nobody wants to win. Kalshi lists a contract on which of the 32 NFL teams finishes the 2026 regular season with the single worst record, and the money has an answer: the Arizona Cardinals, a team that just swapped a former first-overall quarterback for a journeyman and drew one of the league's hardest schedules. Our AI panel scored all 32 teams without seeing a single price, and on the team at the very bottom it shook hands with the market almost to the cent. Where the two disagree is the chase pack. The full board and every model's number are below.
The Quick Answer
Kalshi's 2026 worst-record board makes the Arizona Cardinals the favorite at 26 cents, with the Miami Dolphins close behind at 23, the two teams that carry the NFL's lowest win totals after each moved on from its starting quarterback. Our eight-seat AI panel, six seats active this run, scored all 32 teams price-blind and, after a revision round, blends Arizona to 27.2 percent, a dead heat with the market. The disagreements are all underneath. The panel trims Miami to 20 percent and the New York Jets to 9.1 percent, judging both a touch rich, and it is the board's high voice on the Las Vegas Raiders at 10.1 percent versus an 8-cent price, betting that a rookie quarterback under a brand-new staff carries more downside than the market admits. On the Cleveland Browns, panel and market agree almost exactly (8.7 percent versus 9 cents). The whole 32-team board is below.
How To Read The Worst-Record Prices
Prediction markets are new to a lot of football fans, so one plain-language note before the board. This market is not a win total and not a division race. A team's contract pays out only if that exact team finishes the 2026 regular season with the fewest wins in the entire league, ties broken by the exchange's stated tiebreak. Arizona's 26-cent contract costs about $0.26 and pays $1 if the Cardinals finish worst and $0 if any other team does, so 26 cents is the market saying "about a 26 percent chance." Because this is a race to the bottom rather than a two-team pie, the 32 prices do not have to sum to exactly 100. Each is its own yes-or-no contract, and the board's numbers add to a little over 100 once you include the spread. New to event markets? Start with our plain-English guide to prediction markets.
That is why a bad team is not automatically the pick. Worst-record contracts reward the team with the lowest floor and the hardest path. A club that can lose ten games is a candidate, but a club that can lose ten games while facing a brutal early schedule with a downgraded quarterback is the favorite. The panel weighed the 2026 outlook, not last year's standings.
Free: The Weekly PM Market Brief — the 8-model panel's graded record, the week's biggest market-vs-model gaps, and what's spiking next. One email, Sundays.
The Market At A Glance
| Venue | Kalshi, a CFTC-regulated event-contract exchange (18+; availability varies by state, as of August 2026) |
| The Event | "Pro Football Worst Regular Season Record" (Kalshi event KXRECORDNFLWORST-27): 32 contracts, one per NFL club |
| The Contract | Settlement language, quoted from the contract: a team market "resolves to Yes" if that team "has the worst regular season record in Pro Football in the 2026-27 Pro Football Season." Not a division, not a draft-order tiebreak below the worst team |
| Settlement | Resolves on the final 2026 regular-season records; Kalshi lists an expected expiration of February 8, 2027, and closes early once the worst record is mathematically decided |
| Liquidity | About 28,500 contracts of open interest on Miami and roughly 20,000 on Arizona, thinning fast down the board; the mid- and low-tier contracts are lightly quoted, so treat single-digit prices as indicative |
| Live Prices As Of | August 18, 2026, from the live Kalshi order book (last trade where present, else the mid of bid and ask); panel verdicts generated August 18, price-blind |
These are model estimates, not predictions of fact and not financial advice. Kalshi event contracts trade on a CFTC-regulated exchange; you must be 18 or older and in an eligible state to participate. Every number in this piece gets graded in public once the market settles; the running results live on the full graded scoreboard.
The Board: The 2026 Worst-Record Field
The panel blend below is the equal-weight average of the six active seats, taken after a revision round. The market column is the live Kalshi contract on August 18. The win-total column is the 2026 regular-season over/under, the cleanest public read on how low each team's floor sits.
| Team | 2026 win total | Kalshi | Panel blend | Read |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona Cardinals | 3.5–4.5 (lowest) | 26¢ | 27.2% | Dead heat |
| Miami Dolphins | 4.5 | 23¢ | 20.0% | Market a touch rich |
| Las Vegas Raiders | 5.5 | 8¢ | 10.1% | Panel value |
| New York Jets | 5.5 | 11¢ | 9.1% | Market a touch rich |
| Cleveland Browns | 5.5 | 9¢ | 8.7% | Agree |
| Tennessee Titans | 6.5 | 6¢ | 5.8% | Agree |
| Atlanta Falcons | 7.5 | 4¢ | 3.9% | Agree |
| Carolina Panthers | 7.5 | 3¢ | 3.1% | Agree |
| New Orleans Saints | 7.5 | 3¢ | 1.9% | Market rich |
| New York Giants | 7.5 | 3¢ | 1.8% | Market rich |
The remaining 22 teams price at 2 cents or less on Kalshi and under 1.6 percent on the panel; each one appears in the full per-seat table below. These are model estimates, not financial advice.
The disagreement is small in points and clear in direction. Panel and market land within a couple of points of each other on all ten contenders, so nobody here is calling the board broken. If anything, a price-blind panel independently reproducing the market's ordering is a quiet vote of confidence in both. But the gaps that do exist are not random. The market pays a small premium for the two big-name transitions, Miami and the Jets, while the panel spreads that probability toward the two rebuilds with the widest range of outcomes, Las Vegas and Cleveland. The models are compressing a board the market has stretched at the second tier, and the single sharpest expression of that is a rookie quarterback the crowd is underrating.
More live boards from the same panel: Super Bowl LXI champion board, the Los Angeles Rams sit atop the market at 15¢ to win it all, the same Rams who just imported Myles Garrett from Cleveland, one of the teams on this very board; NFL MVP 2026 board, Josh Allen the market's 10¢ favorite, Patrick Mahomes at 7¢, the opposite end of the same league. Prices fetched August 18, 2026.
The Real Story: The Machines And The Money Agree On The Bottom
Start with what is unusual here, because it is the headline. Most of these panels exist to find the gap between what the crowd prices and what a price-blind model would pay. On the very worst team in football, there is almost no gap. Kalshi has Arizona at 26 cents; the panel, which never saw that number, blends the Cardinals to 27.2 percent. Six independent models and a live order book landed a single point apart.
They agree because the case is overdetermined. Arizona carries the lowest win total in the league, a 3.5-to-4.5 that already implies a five-win team on a neutral schedule. Then the context stacks against it. The Cardinals moved on from Kyler Murray, the former number-one overall pick, and handed the offense to veteran Jacoby Brissett, a capable bridge but a downgrade in ceiling. And the schedule is punishing: reporting has Arizona with the third-hardest slate by 2025 opponent win percentage, with the 49ers, Chiefs, and Eagles all inside the first 13 weeks. A low floor is a candidate; a low floor plus a quarterback downgrade plus the league's third-hardest road is a favorite. Twenty-seven percent is not a prediction that the Cardinals will finish last, it is the honest statement that no other team combines all three risks the way Arizona does.
Miami And The Jets: The Panel's Two Small Fades
If Arizona is where the board agrees, the second tier is where it splits, and it splits the same way twice. Kalshi prices the Dolphins at 23 cents; the panel blends Miami to 20 percent. Kalshi prices the Jets at 11 cents; the panel has New York at 9.1 percent. In both cases the models pay a little less than the crowd for a headline-grabbing quarterback story.
Miami has the more dramatic one. The Dolphins released Tua Tagovailoa in a post-June-1 move that carried a roughly $99 million dead-cap charge, the largest in NFL history, after a 7-10 season, and replaced him with dual-threat Malik Willis on a three-year, $67 million deal. They too drew a brutal front end, reporting pegs Miami's schedule as the second-hardest, with the 49ers, Chiefs, and Vikings stacked into Weeks 2 through 5. All of that is real, and it is why the panel keeps Miami a clear second. What it will not do is price the Dolphins as close to Arizona as the market does. Willis is an upgrade in mobility and a downgrade in nothing catastrophic. The receiving room is better than Arizona's, and a 4.5 win total is half a win higher than the Cardinals'. The panel reads Miami as the second-most-likely worst team, not a co-favorite, and trims three points off the price to say so. The Jets get the same treatment for the same reason: a 35-year-old Geno Smith is a downgrade-flavored story, but Smith has started good football recently and gives New York a floor that a pure rebuild lacks, so the panel shades the crowd's 11 down to nine.
Las Vegas At 8 Cents: The Panel's Quiet Value
The one place the panel pays more than the market is the Raiders. Las Vegas blends to 10.1 percent against an 8-cent price, the board's biggest positive gap, and the reasoning is the one variable that scares forecasters most: a rookie quarterback under a first-year staff. The Raiders hired Klint Kubiak as head coach and drafted Indiana's Fernando Mendoza, the Heisman winner who went 16-0 and won a national title, with the number-one overall pick. Mendoza may be very good. But rookie quarterbacks carry the widest range of outcomes in football. The ceiling is a franchise turn, and the floor is a lost season of growing pains. And a brand-new coaching staff removes the continuity that usually softens a rough rookie year.
The panel is not calling the Raiders bad on talent; it is pricing variance. A veteran-quarterback team like the Jets has a floor that keeps it out of the true basement most of the time. A rookie-quarterback team on a 5.5 win total does not. It can just as easily win eight games as win three, and the three-win tail is exactly what a worst-record contract is buying. Ten percent is the panel saying the Raiders belong a rung above where the market has filed them, not because they are the worst team, but because their downside is fatter than a nickel price implies.
Every Seat's Number
The full price-blind board, all 32 teams, after the revision round. The win totals and offseason moves are the figures the panel saw on August 18.
| Team | Fable | Opus | Sonnet | GLM | DeepSeek | Kimi | Blend | Kalshi |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona Cardinals | 27 | 26.5 | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27.5 | 27.2 | 26¢ |
| Miami Dolphins | 20 | 19 | 20.5 | 20 | 20 | 20.5 | 20.0 | 23¢ |
| Las Vegas Raiders | 10 | 10 | 9.5 | 11 | 10 | 10 | 10.1 | 8¢ |
| New York Jets | 9 | 9 | 9.5 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9.1 | 11¢ |
| Cleveland Browns | 9 | 8.5 | 8.5 | 8.5 | 9 | 8.5 | 8.7 | 9¢ |
| Tennessee Titans | 6 | 6.5 | 5.5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5.8 | 6¢ |
| Atlanta Falcons | 3.5 | 4 | 4.5 | 3 | 4 | 4.5 | 3.9 | 4¢ |
| Carolina Panthers | 3 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 3 | 3 | 3.1 | 3¢ |
| New Orleans Saints | 1.7 | 3.2 | 1.3 | 2 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 3¢ |
| New York Giants | 1.7 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 2 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 3¢ |
| Washington Commanders | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 3¢ |
| Indianapolis Colts | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 2¢ |
| Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 0.9 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 2¢ |
| Chicago Bears | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 1¢ |
| New England Patriots | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.25 | 0.3 | 1¢ |
| Jacksonville Jaguars | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.25 | 0.3 | 1¢ |
| Green Bay Packers | 0.3 | 0.15 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 1¢ |
| Cincinnati Bengals | 0.3 | 0.15 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 1¢ |
| Dallas Cowboys | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.35 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.25 | 0.3 | 1¢ |
| Denver Broncos | 0.25 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 1¢ |
| Los Angeles Rams | 0.25 | 0.1 | 0.25 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 1¢ |
| San Francisco 49ers | 0.25 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1¢ |
| Los Angeles Chargers | 0.25 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1¢ |
| Houston Texans | 0.25 | 0.1 | 0.25 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1¢ |
| Seattle Seahawks | 0.25 | 0.15 | 0.35 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.15 | 0.2 | 1¢ |
| Pittsburgh Steelers | 0.25 | 0.15 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.15 | 0.25 | 0.2 | 2¢ |
| Minnesota Vikings | 0.25 | 0.1 | 0.35 | 0.1 | 0.15 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1¢ |
| Baltimore Ravens | 0.2 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1¢ |
| Buffalo Bills | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1¢ |
| Philadelphia Eagles | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1¢ |
| Kansas City Chiefs | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.1 | 0.15 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1¢ |
| Detroit Lions | 0.15 | 0.03 | 0.15 | 0.1 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.1 | 1¢ |
Every seat on this panel is graded against real market settlements, records to date: GLM 81% on 2,367 graded calls · Kimi 83% on 2,345 graded calls · DeepSeek 80% on 2,392 graded calls. Recomputed daily; the full scoreboard is public.
These are model estimates, not predictions of fact and not financial advice. Six of the panel's eight seats scored this board. The blend is an equal-weight average of the six, taken after a revision round in which each model read the others' anonymized reasoning and could adjust.
Where The Panel Changed Its Mind
The revision round did something the models do not always do: it pulled a true outlier all the way back to the group.
One seat opened well below the field on Arizona, at 21 percent, and after reading the others moved up to 26.5. Its stated reason is the most useful sentence in the whole run: "the single worst record concentrates mass on the clear favorite far more than a win-total line implies. My original 21 under-weighted that concentration effect." — Claude Opus. That is the entire logic of a worst-record market in one line, the favorite in a race-to-the-bottom is worth more than its raw badness suggests, because it only takes one team to be the worst.
A second seat corrected in the other direction, off its own high. It had been the panel's outlier on Atlanta at 6 percent and cut to 4.5 after seeing that every peer sat at 3 to 4, reasoning that "the Tua-over-Penix upgrade clearly lowers Atlanta's bust risk versus true bottom-tier rosters." — Claude Sonnet. The seat that would not move was the market's mirror: one model held Arizona at 28 across both rounds, unbothered by the debate, on the plain read that the lowest win total plus the hardest schedule leaves nothing to reconsider. — GLM. Between the seat that climbed to the favorite and the seat that held it there, the panel converged on Arizona near 27 without anyone forcing it.
What Would Change The Panel's Mind
Four concrete things, each of which would push a number in a stated direction:
- Final Roster Cuts And Week 1 Depth Charts, Due Late August. Several bottom-tier jobs are not fully settled. If a rookie or a shaky veteran is confirmed as a Week 1 starter for one of these teams, that club moves up; a surprise veteran signing at quarterback anywhere in the bottom five moves that team down.
- An Injury To A Bottom-Tier Starting Quarterback. The Cardinals' Brissett, the Dolphins' Willis, the Raiders' Mendoza, and the Jets' Geno Smith are each a single injury away from a replacement-level backup. A significant injury to any of them pushes that team sharply up the board and pulls points from the others.
- Arizona's Or Miami's Front-Loaded September. Both favorites open against a wall, Arizona against the 49ers, Chiefs, and Eagles inside 13 weeks, Miami against the 49ers, Chiefs, and Vikings in Weeks 2 through 5. An 0-4 or 0-5 start by either would cement the favorite and compress the field; a surprise September win or two would loosen it.
- A Visible Tank Signal. A team that trades a veteran at the deadline or benches a starter for a young player is telling the market it has one eye on the 2027 draft. Any such move, most plausibly from Cleveland, would push that team up and reprice the bottom of the board.
Dark Horses The Panel Won't Dismiss
- Cleveland Browns (8.7%, Priced 9¢). Not a market gap, panel and price sit on top of each other, but the most interesting name in the tier. The Browns traded franchise edge rusher Myles Garrett to the Los Angeles Rams (the return included Jared Verse and draft capital), and previews are unanimous that the defense drops without him and that the quarterback room is among the league's weakest. The one thing keeping Cleveland out of the co-favorite conversation is schedule: the Browns drew one of the easiest slates in the league, which is exactly why an 8-to-9 read, not a 15, is the honest number. Every seat had them between 8.5 and 9.
- Tennessee Titans (5.8%, Priced 6¢). The panel's split team. Second-year quarterback Cam Ward, the 2025 number-one overall pick, is coming off a 3-14 rookie season, which is the bear case; the Titans also reportedly added receiver A.J. Brown, which is the reason the panel would not push them higher. One seat held Tennessee at 6.5, another cut it to 5, and the group split the difference.
- The 7.5-Win Cluster (Falcons, Panthers, Saints, Giants, 4¢ And Under). No single one is likely, but one seat flagged the group as a live source of chaos: with four teams all sitting a notch above the bottom five, an early injury to any of them could drop a 7.5-win team into worst-record range that nobody is pricing today. Atlanta is the most watchable, because it is where Tua Tagovailoa landed on a one-year deal and is the reported Week 1 starter over Michael Penix Jr., who has not yet been cleared.
The Settlement Timeline
| Contract Settles | On or about February 8, 2027 (Kalshi's listed expected expiration); markets close early once the worst record is mathematically decided |
| Next Catalysts | Final roster cuts and preseason through late August 2026; the regular season opens in September; Arizona's and Miami's front-loaded slates sort the top of the board across September and October |
| How It Resolves | The contract for the team that finishes with the fewest regular-season wins pays Yes; all others pay No, with the exchange's stated tiebreak applying to a two-team tie for worst |
| Settlement Source | Kalshi settles on the official final 2026 regular-season records; it does not name a separate external data provider for this market |
| Re-Scored | This board is re-scored when the story moves, a quarterback injury, a confirmed Week 1 depth chart, a lopsided September, or a deadline tank signal. Prices and panel numbers as of August 18, 2026 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which NFL team is most likely to have the worst record in 2026? On Kalshi's prices, the Arizona Cardinals are the favorite at 26 cents, just ahead of the Miami Dolphins at 23. Our AI panel agrees, blending Arizona to 27.2 percent, a near-exact match, while trimming Miami to 20 percent.
Why is Arizona favored to finish worst? The Cardinals carry the NFL's lowest win total (a 3.5-to-4.5 over/under), moved on from quarterback Kyler Murray to veteran Jacoby Brissett, and drew one of the league's hardest schedules, with the 49ers, Chiefs, and Eagles inside the first 13 weeks. That combination of a low floor and a brutal path is why both the market and the panel put them at the bottom.
When is the worst-record market decided? It settles on the final 2026 regular-season records. Kalshi lists an expected expiration of February 8, 2027, and closes each contract early once the worst record is mathematically decided.
Can you trade the NFL worst-record market on Kalshi? Kalshi is a CFTC-regulated event-contract exchange, not a sportsbook; you must be 18 or older and in an eligible state. The numbers on this page are model estimates, not financial advice. For free NFL picks and live odds across every sportsbook, see OddsShopper's free expert picks.
Hottest Prediction Markets Right Now
- 2028 Democratic presidential nominee · $179M traded
- FedEx St. Jude Championship Winner · $66M traded
- 2027 Pro Football Champion · $61M traded
- 2028 U.S. Presidential Election winner? · $59M traded
- 2028 Republican presidential nominee · $57M traded
- Pro Baseball Champion · $53M traded
Every market above links to our full AI model verdict; browse them all on the OddsShopper prediction markets hub, and see how every settled call actually scored on the full graded scoreboard.
The Bottom Line
Kalshi's 2026 worst-record board is a bet on quarterback transitions gone wrong, and its favorite is the team that stacked the most of them: Arizona downgraded at quarterback, drew the third-hardest schedule, and already carried the league's lowest win total. The panel does not fight that read. It independently landed on the Cardinals within a point of the market, which is about as strong a confirmation as this exercise produces. Where it parts ways is the chase pack: it pays a little less for the two big-name transitions in Miami and New York, and a little more for the rookie-quarterback variance in Las Vegas, quietly reshaping a second tier the market has stretched. Nobody is calling this board broken. The models are saying the worst team is obvious, and the interesting money is on who finishes second-worst. A full season will grade every number here in public.
