Oscar Nominations 2027 Predictions: Kalshi's 47-Film Odds

Kalshi has turned the 2027 Best Picture race into a live market five months before the nominations are read: 47 separate yes/no contracts on which films make the Academy's 10-slot Best Picture lineup. We asked our AI model panel to score the entire board without letting any of the models see a single price, and the machines came back agreeing with the market on the true critical frontrunners while flatly refusing to pay the blockbuster prices Kalshi has hung on a handful of popular titles.

New to this kind of market? Here is a plain-English guide to how prediction markets actually work.

The Quick Answer

The panel and the market see the top of the board the same way. Both make Christopher Nolan's The Odyssey a near-lock (a 94.6% blend against a ~98¢ price), and both love Cannes' two big winners, Fjord (the Palme d'Or winner, 68%) and The Black Ball (Cannes' Best Director prize, 72%), plus Martin McDonagh's unseen Wild Horse Nine (62%). Where they split is the middle of the board: Kalshi is paying blockbuster and popularity prices the panel will not match. The models fade Project Hail Mary from 89¢ to a 50% blend, Dune: Part Three from 81¢ to 54%, and hammer two names hardest of all: Digger (Iñárritu and Tom Cruise) from 60¢ to 17%, and Jesse Eisenberg's unseen musical The Debut from 59¢ to 20%.

The panel's logic in one line: with 10 slots and a field still mostly unseen before the fall festivals, a film needs a real nomination case, not just a big opening weekend or a famous director, and the models only pay for the case.

• Consensus Locks: The Odyssey (~98¢ / 94.6%), The Black Ball (~72¢ / 72.2%), Fjord (~62¢ / 68.0%), Wild Horse Nine (~70¢ / 62.4%)
• Biggest Model Fades: Digger (~60¢ / 17.4%, a 43-point gap), Project Hail Mary (~89¢ / 50.4%, 39 points), The Debut (~59¢ / 20.2%, 39 points), Obsession (~47¢ / 12.2%, 35 points)
• Names The Panel Likes More Than The Market: All of a Sudden (~24¢ / 42.6%, +19) and Ink (~36¢ / 45.8%, +10)
• The Eligibility Trap: at least three priced films (Saturn Return at ~20¢, plus longshots) have reportedly slipped to 2027 and cannot be nominated this cycle

The full 47-film board, the fall-festival calendar that will move it, and every model's number are below.

The Market At A Glance

Venue	Kalshi
The Event	"Oscar nominees: Best Picture" (Kalshi event KXOSCARNOMPIC-27), 47 separate yes/no film contracts
The Contract	Each market resolves YES if that film is among the Best Picture nominees at the 99th Academy Awards. Best Picture has 10 nomination slots, so these are independent contracts and their prices do not sum to 100
Key Date	Nominations are expected in January 2027 (contracts settle January 21, 2027); the ceremony honors films released in 2026
Liquidity (As Of August 19, 2026)	Thin-to-moderate books: the public feed reports no per-market volume, and quoted spreads on the busier films run a few cents while the longshots are wider. Read every price as softer than a deep sports market
Prices Below As Of	August 19, 2026 (mid-quotes and last trades from Kalshi's public market feed)

These are model estimates, not predictions of fact and not financial advice. Kalshi event contracts trade on a CFTC-regulated exchange; you must be 18 or older and in an eligible state to participate. Every number in this piece gets graded in public once the market settles, in the full graded Model Verdict scoreboard.

Hottest Prediction Markets Right Now

• 2028 Democratic presidential nominee · $179M traded
• FedEx St. Jude Championship Winner · $66M traded
• 2027 Pro Football Champion · $61M traded
• 2028 U.S. Presidential Election winner? · $59M traded
• 2028 Republican presidential nominee · $57M traded
• Pro Baseball Champion · $53M traded

Every market above links to our full AI model verdict; browse them all on the OddsShopper prediction markets hub, and see how every settled call actually scored on the full graded scoreboard.

What Actually Decides This Board

Four fetched facts define how to read all 47 contracts, and they are the reason the panel and the market keep diverging:

• Ten Slots, Forty-Seven Films. Best Picture nominates 10 titles, so the whole board can carry at most about 10 real yes-side prices. Most of these contracts are longshots by arithmetic alone, and the panel's numbers across the field add up to roughly nine expected nominees, right where they should.
• Eligibility Is Decisive, And Some Films Have Left 2026. The 99th Academy Awards honor 2026 releases. Greta Gerwig's Narnia: The Magician's Nephew moved to a February 2027 theatrical date, Ruben Östlund's The Entertainment System Is Down is now aimed at Cannes 2027, and Joel Coen's Jack of Spades is filed as a 2027 film. All three cannot be nominated this cycle, and the market has correctly buried them near a penny. One priced name, Saturn Return, still has no confirmed 2026 release date and could slip to 2027, yet still trades near 20¢ — a live disagreement covered in the traps section below.
• The Season Has Not Started Yet. As of mid-August, the festivals that launch most Best Picture contenders — Venice (opening September 2), Telluride, Toronto and New York — have not happened. Many of the market's favorites, from Wild Horse Nine to Behemoth to Dune: Part Three, are completely unseen. Their standing rests on pedigree and positioning, not on a single review.
• The Critics' Prediction Consensus Is A Real Signal, And It Splits From The Market. The panel was given the two dated pundit boards. AwardsWatch's August 18 Best Picture top ten runs The Odyssey, The Black Ball, Wild Horse Nine, Fjord, Behemoth, Dune: Part Three, Ink, The Invite, Elsinore and All of a Sudden. Gold Derby, by contrast, ranks Project Hail Mary as its Best Picture frontrunner and has Digger inside its top three. The boards disagree most on exactly the films Kalshi prices highest — and where AwardsWatch leaves Digger out of Best Picture entirely, keeping it in the Best Director conversation, the panel lands on the more skeptical read.

Here is the short version first, then every model's raw number.

The Board

Film	Market	Model blend	Gap (blend% − mkt¢)
The Odyssey	~98¢	94.6%	-3
The Black Ball	~72¢	72.2%	+0
Fjord	~62¢	68.0%	+6
Wild Horse Nine	~70¢	62.4%	-8
Dune: Part Three	~81¢	54.4%	-27
Project Hail Mary	~89¢	50.4%	-39
Behemoth	~48¢	46.4%	-2
Ink	~36¢	45.8%	+10
All Of A Sudden	~24¢	42.6%	+19
The Invite	~42¢	41.2%	-1
Elsinore	~38¢	38.0%	+0
The Adventures Of Cliff Booth	~26¢	32.0%	+6
The Social Reckoning	~23¢	22.2%	-1
Being Heumann	~32¢	21.2%	-11
The Debut	~59¢	20.2%	-39
Paper Tiger	~18¢	17.6%	-0
Digger	~60¢	17.4%	-43
Josephine	~18¢	12.4%	-6
Obsession	~47¢	12.2%	-35
Disclosure Day	~10¢	9.0%	-1
Michael	~12¢	8.8%	-3
Artificial	~6¢	8.6%	+3
Possible Love	~3¢	8.4%	+5
Minotaur	~4¢	7.4%	+3
Werwulf	~3¢	6.8%	+4
Primetime	~33¢	6.6%	-26
Tony	~15¢	6.2%	-9
Sense And Sensibility	~17¢	6.2%	-11
Club Kid	~30¢	4.8%	-25
1949 / Fatherland	~12¢	4.8%	-7
The Uprising	~7¢	4.6%	-2
Clarissa	~4¢	4.6%	+1
The Drama	~6¢	3.2%	-3
Cry To Heaven	~9¢	3.2%	-6
Saturn Return	~20¢	2.8%	-17
Hope	~2¢	2.8%	+1
Spider-Man: Brand New Day	~9¢	2.6%	-6
Rose	~3¢	2.6%	-0
Backrooms	~2¢	2.0%	+0
The Death Of Robin Hood	~2¢	1.8%	-0
Avengers: Doomsday	~6¢	1.6%	-4
The Whisper Man	~2¢	1.6%	-0
I Love Boosters	~2¢	1.6%	-0
Parallel Tales	~2¢	1.4%	-1
The Entertainment System Is Down	~2¢	1.2%	-1
Narnia: The Magician's Nephew	~1¢	1.2%	+0
Jack Of Spades	~6¢	1.2%	-5

Every Seat's Number

Numbers below are each seat's probability that the film is nominated for Best Picture, after the revision round.

Film	Market	Fable	Opus	Sonnet	GLM	DeepSeek	Blend	Gap
The Odyssey	~98¢	95	93	95	95	95	94.6%	-3
The Black Ball	~72¢	68	71	75	72	75	72.2%	+0
Fjord	~62¢	62	70	70	68	70	68.0%	+6
Wild Horse Nine	~70¢	60	62	68	62	60	62.4%	-8
Dune: Part Three	~81¢	50	54	58	55	55	54.4%	-27
Project Hail Mary	~89¢	48	54	55	50	45	50.4%	-39
Behemoth	~48¢	45	49	50	48	40	46.4%	-2
Ink	~36¢	44	49	48	50	38	45.8%	+10
All Of A Sudden	~24¢	40	43	40	48	42	42.6%	+19
The Invite	~42¢	40	46	40	45	35	41.2%	-1
Elsinore	~38¢	36	38	43	40	33	38.0%	+0
The Adventures Of Cliff Booth	~26¢	32	33	35	32	28	32.0%	+6
The Social Reckoning	~23¢	25	25	18	25	18	22.2%	-1
Being Heumann	~32¢	20	20	14	30	22	21.2%	-11
The Debut	~59¢	20	20	15	28	18	20.2%	-39
Paper Tiger	~18¢	14	18	18	20	18	17.6%	-0
Digger	~60¢	20	22	15	15	15	17.4%	-43
Josephine	~18¢	12	8	12	15	15	12.4%	-6
Obsession	~47¢	14	15	12	8	12	12.2%	-35
Disclosure Day	~10¢	4	11	10	12	8	9.0%	-1
Michael	~12¢	5	8	8	5	18	8.8%	-3
Artificial	~6¢	5	8	8	12	10	8.6%	+3
Possible Love	~3¢	6	8	5	15	8	8.4%	+5
Minotaur	~4¢	9	10	5	8	5	7.4%	+3
Werwulf	~3¢	8	0	6	8	5	6.8%	+4
Primetime	~33¢	7	7	6	8	5	6.6%	-26
Tony	~15¢	3	5	8	8	7	6.2%	-9
Sense And Sensibility	~17¢	7	6	5	8	5	6.2%	-11
Club Kid	~30¢	4	4	6	5	5	4.8%	-25
1949 / Fatherland	~12¢	3	4	4	8	5	4.8%	-7
The Uprising	~7¢	3	3	4	10	3	4.6%	-2
Clarissa	~4¢	3	3	7	5	5	4.6%	+1
The Drama	~6¢	2	3	3	5	3	3.2%	-3
Cry To Heaven	~9¢	3	4	5	3	1	3.2%	-6
Saturn Return	~20¢	2	4	4	3	1	2.8%	-17
Hope	~2¢	2	3	3	3	3	2.8%	+1
Spider-Man: Brand New Day	~9¢	3	3	3	2	2	2.6%	-6
Rose	~3¢	2	3	3	3	2	2.6%	-0
Backrooms	~2¢	2	2	2	2	2	2.0%	+0
The Death Of Robin Hood	~2¢	1	2	3	2	1	1.8%	-0
Avengers: Doomsday	~6¢	2	2	2	1	1	1.6%	-4
The Whisper Man	~2¢	1	2	2	2	1	1.6%	-0
I Love Boosters	~2¢	1	2	2	2	1	1.6%	-0
Parallel Tales	~2¢	1	1	2	2	1	1.4%	-1
The Entertainment System Is Down	~2¢	1	2	1	1	1	1.2%	-1
Narnia: The Magician's Nephew	~1¢	1	2	1	1	1	1.2%	+0
Jack Of Spades	~6¢	1	2	1	1	1	1.2%	-5

These are model estimates, not predictions of fact and not financial advice. The Blend column is the simple mean of the five model numbers in its row. The last column is a quick directional gap, the blend percentage minus the raw market price in cents; because these are independent yes/no contracts rather than a single mutually exclusive field, there is no vig to remove and no reason the column should net to anything. Market figures are mid-quotes and last trades from Kalshi's public feed, as of August 19, 2026, on books that thin out fast below the frontrunners.

Every seat on this panel is graded against real market settlements — records to date: Claude Fable 84% on 508 graded calls · Claude Opus 85% on 578 graded calls · Claude Sonnet 84% on 556 graded calls · GLM 81% on 2,367 graded calls · DeepSeek 80% on 2,392 graded calls. Recomputed daily; the full scoreboard is public.

A note on the panel. Our standard Model Verdict lineup runs eight seats. Five scored this board: Claude Fable, Claude Opus, Claude Sonnet, GLM and DeepSeek; the other three were unavailable on this run. All five scored the 47 contracts on August 19, 2026 without seeing any prices, working from a fetched, dated summary of each film's release status, reception and awards standing, then read one another's anonymized reasoning and revised. Every model's number also lands in our back-tested Model Verdict ledger, where past price-blind calls are graded against settled results.

More live boards from the same panel: the same models score The Odyssey's odds to actually win Best Picture, where Kalshi's winner market sits near 60¢, well under its ~98¢ nomination price; the Emmys 2026 model verdict reads the TV-awards board, where The Pitt leads the most-wins market near 47¢ (Widow's Bay is second near 41¢); and the next James Bond model verdict scores the 007 casting field, where the market has flipped and Jack Lowden now leads near 35¢, with Callum Turner faded into the high 20s. Prices fetched August 19, 2026.

The Four Names The Panel And Market Both Believe In

At the top of the board the models and the crowd shake hands. Every seat made The Odyssey its single most confident yes, a 94.6% blend against a ~98¢ price, and the reasons are all already on the record: the film is out, it holds a 95% Rotten Tomatoes score (a career best for Nolan) and more than $1 billion in worldwide box office, and the Academy has already started member screenings in 70mm. As Opus put it, it is the "unanimous number-one lock." When a contract is this settled, the panel simply confirms it.

The more interesting agreement is on the two films Cannes crowned. Fjord, Cristian Mungiu's Palme d'Or winner, blends to 68% and is one of only two frontrunners the panel prices above the market. The Black Ball, which won Los Javis the Best Director prize at Cannes, lands at 72.2%, dead level with its ~72¢ price. Both are exactly the kind of prestige-festival winner that converts to nominations, and both were where the revision round did its most useful work, as several seats admitted they had started too low. Martin McDonagh's Wild Horse Nine, his unseen Toronto premiere, rounds out the quartet at 62.4% on the strength of a director with a Best Picture pedigree and a marquee cast, priced a touch under its ~70¢ market only because no one has yet seen it.

The Market's Blockbuster Bets, The Panel's Biggest Fades

This is where the piece earns its title. The four widest gaps on the board are all the same shape: a film the market has priced like a lock on the strength of a big opening, a famous director, or pure popularity, and a panel that will not pay for any of those things without a nomination case behind them.

• Digger, ~60¢ Market, 17.4% Blend, A 43-Point Gap, The Widest On The Board. Alejandro G. Iñárritu directing Tom Cruise is a real event, and the market prices it like a lock. But the pundits split on it: AwardsWatch leaves Digger out of its Best Picture top ten entirely, keeping it in the Best Director conversation, even as Gold Derby ranks it inside its own top three. Sonnet flagged it as "the surprising fade despite Iñárritu's Best Picture-winning pedigree." A director-and-star play priced like a lock, on a film no one has seen and one respected board leaves out of the category, is exactly the gap the panel priced.
• Project Hail Mary, ~89¢ Market, 50.4% Blend, 39 Points. Here the panel is split with itself, and honest about why. The film is released, beloved (95% Rotten Tomatoes), and a Gold Derby co-frontrunner, but it is absent from AwardsWatch's August top ten, and a crowd-pleasing sci-fi blockbuster is exactly the profile that can miss a crowded Best Picture lineup. The models landed it on the right side of a coin flip and no further, which is a long way from an 89-cent near-certainty.
• The Debut, ~59¢ Market, 20.2% Blend, 39 Points. Jesse Eisenberg's musical comedy is completely unseen, doesn't premiere until Toronto in September, and sits in the critics' "next up" tier, not the top ten. The market is paying a top-ten price for a bubble contender no one has watched.
• Obsession, ~47¢ Market, 12.2% Blend, 35 Points. A real commercial-and-critical horror hit, but horror almost never converts to a Best Picture nomination, and the pundits have it just outside the field. The panel treated the market's 47¢ as buying the box office, not the nomination.

Dune: Part Three is the gentler version of the same story: 54.4% against an ~81¢ price, a film the panel respects on pedigree (Part Two was nominated) but will not lock while it is unseen and its studio skips the fall festivals.

Where The Panel Changed Its Mind

The panel scored the board once, then read one another's anonymized numbers and revised. Most of the movement was convergence toward the fetched evidence, and three arcs stand out:

• DeepSeek Pulled Project Hail Mary From 80% Down To 45%. It was the lone high outlier on the market's favorite in round one, and after seeing the rest of the panel weigh the AwardsWatch omission it cut hard, joining the fade rather than anchoring the market. It made similar downward moves on Ink, Behemoth and Elsinore, tightening the whole middle of the board.
• Sonnet Moved The Other Way On The Cannes Winners, And Said Why. It lifted Fjord from 50% to 70% and Wild Horse Nine from 50% to 68%, writing that that it had "undervalued" the "Palme d'Or and Cannes Director wins." That is the revision round working as intended: a seat reading the room, finding a real argument it had underweighted, and moving.
• Opus Held Its Structure And Explained The Discipline. "Held core structure; nudged Fjord and Black Ball up slightly toward consensus," it wrote, and "no forecaster surfaced eligibility facts I'd missed." On a board where the temptation is to drift toward the crowd, a seat that confirms the eligibility reads, tightens the prestige names, and refuses to move on the blockbusters is doing exactly what the second round is for.

What Would Change The Panel's Mind

These numbers are an August snapshot of a race whose real evidence has not arrived yet. Specific, event-shaped things would move them fast:

• The Fall Festivals. Venice (opening September 2), Telluride, Toronto and New York will give the first real reactions to Wild Horse Nine, Ink, Behemoth, Elsinore, Being Heumann and The Debut. A rapturous premiere turns a pedigree bet into a screened contender; a flat one deflates it. This is the single biggest catalyst on the calendar.
• The Precursor Awards. Once the guild and critics' groups (SAG, PGA, the National Board of Review, the Globes) start naming films in December and January, the pundit boards the panel leans on will firm up or scramble, and the unseen tentpoles will either convert or fall away.
• A Release-Date Slip. Any film that moves its 2026 date into 2027 — the way Narnia and The Entertainment System Is Down already have — goes to essentially zero on this board. Cry to Heaven and Saturn Return are the names to watch here.
• Reviews And Box Office For The Still-Unseen Giants. Strong reviews for Dune: Part Three or a surprise critical embrace of a blockbuster would close the panel's gap to the market; weak ones would widen it.

Dark Horses The Panel Won't Dismiss

Below the top ten, a few sub-10% names carry more of a case than their price suggests, and at least one seat gave each a real number:

• Josephine (12.4% Blend) Is The Panel's Favorite True Long Shot. Beth de Araújo's thriller won both the Grand Jury Prize and the Audience Award in Sundance's dramatic competition, the kind of double that has launched Best Picture runs before. Fable called it "the CODA-style dark horse," and DeepSeek and GLM both had it at 15%.
• Artificial (8.6%) Is A Wild Card The Market Has All But Written Off. Luca Guadagnino's Sam Altman film was dropped by one studio, rescued by Neon for a December Oscar-qualifying run, and its test screenings drew mixed word — but Guadagnino has a Best Picture nomination on his shelf, and GLM priced the pedigree at 12%.
• Minotaur (7.4%) And 1949 / Fatherland (4.8%) Are The International-Lane Threats. A Cannes Grand Prix (Minotaur) and a Cannes Best Director win (Fatherland) are real credentials; the panel treats them mainly as International Feature plays, but Opus gave Minotaur a double-digit number on the crossover chance.

The Traps: Rows That Look Like Signal But Are Not

Transparency beats a clean story, so here is where the board can mislead you:

• A High Price Is Not A Nomination. The single biggest trap is reading 60¢ on Digger or 59¢ on The Debut as "basically in." Neither sits in the critics' Best Picture top ten, and both are exactly the gaps the panel is flagging.
• Some Priced Films May Not Even Be Eligible. Saturn Return still trades near 20¢, but it has no confirmed 2026 release date and could slip to 2027, which would make it ineligible for this ceremony entirely; the panel priced that risk at under 3%. Treat any double-digit price on a film without a locked 2026 release as a question, not a signal.
• The Thin Books Make Every Number Soft. With no reported volume and spreads that widen quickly below the favorites, most of these prices move on light trading. Treat the exact cents as directional, not precise.
• Unseen Is Not The Same As Unlikely, In Either Direction. Half the contenders have not screened. The panel priced their pedigree and positioning, not a verdict — a great Venice premiere or a bad one will rewrite these lines.

Settlement Timeline

Market Settles	Around January 21, 2027, when the 99th Academy Awards nominations are announced
Key Catalyst: Fall Festivals	Venice (from September 2), Telluride (early September), Toronto (from September 10) and New York (October) deliver first reactions to the unseen contenders
Key Catalyst: Precursor Awards	National Board of Review, critics' groups, the Golden Globes and guild nominations across December and January reshape the field
Key Catalyst: Release-Date Changes	Any film that slips into 2027 (watch Cry to Heaven, Saturn Return) drops off this board entirely
Re-Scoring	This board is re-scored whenever the story moves — a festival premiere, a precursor result, a date change — with the prices above stamped as of August 19, 2026

How To Read These Prices

These do not add up to 100, and that is correct. Unlike a "who wins" market where exactly one outcome hits, this is 47 independent yes/no questions, and about 10 films are nominated. So there is no de-vigging to do and no reason the prices should sum to anything. Read each contract on its own: a 60-cent Digger means the market thinks there is about a 60% chance it is nominated, full stop, and the panel's 17% is a flat disagreement with that specific number. If you want the general habit of turning a prediction-market price into real odds, it applies one contract at a time.

That habit — checking a price against an independent estimate — is the whole idea behind line shopping and finding value. A few honest points before reading too much into any number above:

• Eligibility. Kalshi is a CFTC-regulated event-contract exchange, not a sportsbook. You must be 18 or older and located in an eligible state, and availability varies by state and can change.
• Liquidity And Spread. These are thin books with no reported volume, so the "price" on any contract is softer than one number suggests and your fill depends on the spread when you act.
• Time And Uncertainty. This board does not settle until January, and most of the field has not screened, so expect the lines to move a lot between now and nominations morning.
• Not Advice. Everything here is analysis for information, not a recommendation to trade. These are model estimates, not predictions of fact and not financial advice.

More on this: Barcelona Vs Feyenoord Odds: Does The Favorite Survive The Fee? · Where Does Bitcoin End 2026? Kalshi's Price-Band Odds · The Longest Shot On This Board Might Be The Best-Kept Secret · 2026 Governor Races: Every Kalshi Board We Track · MAC Championship Odds: Ohio Never Has To Play The Favorite

The Bottom Line

The market and the models agree on the ceiling and split on the middle. Both make The Odyssey a near-lock and both back Cannes' winners, Fjord and The Black Ball, but from there Kalshi keeps paying blockbuster and popularity prices — 89 cents on Project Hail Mary, 60 on Digger, 59 on The Debut, 47 on Obsession — that the panel, working only from release status, reception and the critics' consensus, refuses to match. The read to take is the one the eligibility flags make plainest: with 10 slots, a field still mostly unseen, and at least a few priced films that may not even qualify, a big number on this board is a question, not an answer, until the fall festivals start answering it. If this method is your thing, our next James Bond model verdict and Emmys 2026 model verdict score the next boards the same way.

Verdicts generated August 19, 2026. Prices as of August 19, 2026, from Kalshi's public market feed. Panel: Claude Fable, Claude Opus, Claude Sonnet, GLM and DeepSeek, price-blind. These are model estimates, not predictions of fact and not financial advice.

Prices on this page are Kalshi's book. If you also trade on Polymarket, code OS4 gets new users a $50 trading bonus on a $10 deposit — affiliate link; terms as stated by Polymarket; 18+, availability varies by state.