Minnesota Senate 2026 Odds: The AI Model Verdict

Minnesota votes for a U.S. senator on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, for the first open Senate seat the state has seen since 2006: DFL incumbent Tina Smith is retiring, the parties settle their nominees at the August 11 primary, and the winner takes a seat a Republican held as recently as 2009, when Norm Coleman lost it by 312 votes in the 2008 recount. Kalshi has turned it into a market, one yes/no contract per party, and we asked our AI model panel to score the race without letting any of them see a single price. They came back agreeing with the market on the favorite and splitting on just how safe that favorite really is.

New to Kalshi event markets? Start here → how Kalshi's yes/no contracts work.

The Quick Answer

Kalshi's market prices the Democratic (DFL) side near 95 cents and the Republican side near 6 cents, treating this open seat as close to safe for the Democrats. Our price-blind, six-model panel is a little less certain: it blends the DFL side to about 86% and the Republican side to about 14%. Both agree the DFL is the clear favorite; they split on how safe it is. The market is pricing a state whose Democratic lean has hardened since a Republican last won a Senate race here in 2002, a roughly two-and-a-half-to-one Democratic cash edge, and a unanimous Likely-Democratic rating. The panel is pricing the uncertainty that sits underneath all of that: an open seat with no incumbent, an August 11 primary that has not happened so neither party's nominee is set, and a 2024 presidential margin that narrowed to about four points.

Free: The Weekly PM Market Brief — the 8-model panel's graded record, the week's biggest market-vs-model gaps, and what's spiking next. One email, Sundays. Sign up in the box at the end of this article.

• Market Favorite: DFL side, ~95¢
• Model Favorite: DFL side, ~86% blend, agreeing with the market on the winner
• The Gap: the panel prices the Republican side at about 14%, more than double its ~6-cent market, fading a near-locked Democratic price toward a strong-but-not-safe hold
• The Tension In One Line: every structural fact points to the DFL, but the seat is open and the nominees are not even chosen yet, so the panel read a 95-cent Democrat as a shade overpriced rather than a settled result
• The Panel's Logic: Minnesota's hardened Democratic lean, the cash edge, and a national midterm wind that runs against the Republican-held White House keep the DFL heavily favored, but an open seat before either party has picked a nominee, in a state that sent a Republican to this very seat within the last two decades, is not a 6-cent Republican dog

The case for the DFL hold, where the Republican's slim path runs, the full board, the polling, the open-seat picture, and a plain-English guide to reading these prices are all below.

The Market At A Glance

Venue	Kalshi, a CFTC-regulated event-contract exchange (18+; availability varies by state, as of August 2026)
The Event	"Minnesota Senate winner?" (Kalshi event SENATEMN-26), one yes/no contract per party
The Contract	The DFL market resolves YES if a Democrat is sworn in as Minnesota's Class 2 senator for the term beginning in 2027; the Republican market resolves YES if a Republican is. It pays on the winner's party, not the named candidate
Liquidity (As Of August 8, 2026)	A quiet, long-dated board on Kalshi's live market data: live two-sided quotes were unquoted at this snapshot and open interest was not reported, so the prices below come from recent daily-candle closes rather than a continuous tight bid/ask. Treat the exact cents as indicative, not depth-tested
Snapshot	Prices as of August 8, 2026 (latest snapshot; prices on this page refresh as the story moves toward November). Verdicts generated August 8, 2026

These are model estimates, not predictions of fact and not financial or voting advice. Kalshi event contracts trade on a CFTC-regulated exchange; you must be 18 or older and in an eligible state to participate, and this article does not advocate for or against any candidate or party. Every number in this piece gets graded in public once the market settles, in the full graded Model Verdict scoreboard.

What Actually Decides This Race

Before either party's nominee is even chosen, five fetched facts define the board, and all but one pull the same direction:

• This Is An Open Seat, And The Nominees Are Not Final. Tina Smith is not seeking a second full term, so neither side carries an incumbency advantage into November. The state primaries are August 11, 2026, which means both matchups are still presumptive. On the DFL side, Lieutenant Governor Peggy Flanagan holds the party endorsement, while four-term U.S. Representative Angie Craig skipped the endorsing convention, went straight to the primary, and leads the field in money. On the Republican side, former Navy SEAL Adam Schwarze won the convention endorsement after six ballots, while broadcaster Michele Tafoya leads the GOP field in fundraising and is the only Republican tested in general-election polling. Because the contract settles on party, the primary does not change what the market resolves; it only sets the names on the November ballot.
• Minnesota Leans Democratic At The Top Of The Ticket, But By Less Than It Used To. Kamala Harris carried the state about 51.1% to 46.9% in 2024 (roughly D+4.2), down from Joe Biden's 52.4% to 45.3% in 2020 (about D+7.1). It stayed blue both times, but the top-of-ticket margin narrowed, and that shrinking cushion is the one fact on this board that gives the Republican side any room at all.
• The Recent Senate History Leans Heavily Democratic, But This Exact Seat Is Not Virgin Republican Ground. In 2024 Amy Klobuchar beat Republican Royce White by about 15.7 points, her narrowest career margin and still a double-digit blowout, and in the 2018 special election for this Class 2 seat, Tina Smith beat Karin Housley 52.97% to 42.35% (about D+10.6). But the longer memory matters: Republican Norm Coleman held this very seat from 2003 to 2009, and it flipped to the DFL only in the 2008 recount, when Al Franken beat Coleman by 312 votes, one of the closest Senate elections in U.S. history. No Republican has won a Minnesota Senate race since Coleman in 2002, but this is not a seat Republicans have never held; the DFL's grip has hardened over two decades rather than existed forever.
• The Money Strongly Favors The DFL. Per FEC filings through June 30, 2026, Angie Craig reported about $11.9 million raised for the cycle with roughly $5.0 million cash on hand, and Peggy Flanagan about $6.0 million raised with roughly $1.6 million on hand. On the Republican side, Michele Tafoya led with about $4.7 million raised and roughly $2.1 million on hand, ahead of Adam Schwarze's roughly $1.4 million and Royce White's roughly $0.6 million. The best-funded Republican trails the best-funded Democrat by roughly two and a half to one. Nationally, the president's party has lost House seats in 18 of the last 20 midterms, and with a Republican in the White House in 2026 that structural wind runs against the Republican here, not with him.
• The Raters Are Unanimous, And The Polls Back Them By Single Digits. Cook Political Report, Sabato's Crystal Ball, Inside Elections, Decision Desk HQ, The Economist, and RealClearPolitics all rate the race Likely Democratic, with one outlet at Safe Democratic; none places Minnesota on the Republican side of the line, and none calls it a tossup. The public head-to-heads all have the DFL candidate ahead of Michele Tafoya: an Emerson College poll in February had Craig up 47-40 and Flanagan up 47-41, and Democratic-firm Impact Research polls in May had both DFL candidates up about seven. Every lead points the same way, though the only Republican tested is not the party-endorsed candidate.

That framework is the whole story of this board. The market weights the two-decade Democratic hold, the run of double-digit wins, the cash gap, and the unanimous rating into a near-safe Democratic seat. The models, working from the same fetched facts, weighted the open seat, the not-yet-settled primary, the narrowed 2024 margin, and the fact that no poll has tested the actual GOP nominee more heavily, and priced the Republican side above its market.

Here is the short version first, then every model's raw number.

The Board

Outcome	Nominee & status	Market	Model blend
Democratic (DFL)	Flanagan (endorsed) / Craig (money leader); primary Aug 11	~95¢	86.3%
Republican	Schwarze (endorsed) / Tafoya (money leader); primary Aug 11	~6¢	13.7%

More live boards from the same panel: New Hampshire Senate model verdict (Democratic ~88¢ / Republican ~12¢), Georgia Senate model verdict (Democratic ~92¢ / Republican ~9¢), and Maine Senate model verdict (Democratic ~64¢ / Republican ~37¢). Prices fetched August 8, 2026.

Every Seat's Number

Numbers below are each seat's probability that the named party wins the seat. The two rows are complements, because this is a closed two-way race.

Outcome	Market	Fable	Opus	Sonnet	GLM	Kimi	DeepSeek	Blend	Gap (blend% − mkt¢)
Democratic (DFL)	~95¢	88.0	88.0	88.0	82.0	85.0	87.0	86.3%	-9
Republican	~6¢	12.0	12.0	12.0	18.0	15.0	13.0	13.7%	+8

These are model estimates, not predictions of fact and not financial or voting advice. The Blend column is the simple mean of the six model numbers shown in its row. The last column is a quick directional gap, the blend percentage minus the raw market price in cents. Because this is a closed two-way race, the two prices sum to about 100 cents, so there is almost no vig to remove, and the panel sits modestly to the Republican side of the market: agreeing the DFL is heavily favored, but pricing the Republican's 6-cent contract up to about 14 percent. The models scored the party outcomes, which is exactly how the contract settles.

A note on the panel. Our standard Model Verdict lineup runs eight seats. On this run three were unavailable: the ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok command-line seats were not installed on the machine that produced these verdicts. This board therefore runs on six models: Claude Fable, Claude Opus, Claude Sonnet, GLM, Kimi, and DeepSeek. All six scored the race on August 8, 2026, without seeing any prices, working from a fetched, dated summary of the candidates, the August primary picture, the race ratings, the structural voting history, fundraising, and the live head-to-head polls. Five of the six then read one another's anonymized reasoning and revised; the sixth (Fable) completed only the first round, so its round-one number stands in the table. Most of the five held within a point or two of their opening scores, and one (GLM) revised up seven points after reading the others. Every model's number also lands in our back-tested Model Verdict ledger, where past price-blind calls are graded against settled results so the method is measured, not just asserted.

The board comes down to two forces: the near-safe Democratic price the models trust slightly less than the market does, and the irreducible open-seat uncertainty a pre-primary race still carries.

The one line that explains the whole board: every structural fact favors the DFL, but the panel priced the Republican above the market because an open seat whose nominees are not even chosen yet reads to the models as a strong Democratic hold rather than a 95-cent lock. — the panel consensus

The Democratic Side: Why The DFL Is Heavily Favored

Every seat made the DFL the favorite, and the case is not ideology, it is the weight of consistent structural signal. Opus, landing at 88%, put the core of it plainly: a hardened D+4-7 lean, unanimous Likely-Democratic ratings, a roughly two-and-a-half-to-one money edge, and consistent mid-single-digit leads over the only Republican yet tested, all pushed the same direction by an out-party midterm environment and outweighing open-seat and primary-timing uncertainty, "which affects candidate identity but not party outcome." Sonnet, also at 88%, reached for the map: the national midterm base rate is real, but it is "a national mean pulled by seats that are structurally competitive," and Minnesota is not one of the four seats the raters call Republican-competitive.

The second pillar is money and the national environment. The DFL's fundraising edge is not marginal, its two top candidates raised more between them than the entire Republican field, and the president's party has lost House seats in 18 of the last 20 midterms, a wind that in 2026 runs against the Republican-held White House. DeepSeek, at 87%, tied it together: "Unanimous Likely-D ratings, D+7 polling lead, massive cash edge, and two decades of GOP Senate futility in Minnesota outweigh midterm penalty risks."

The favorite's thesis in one line: two decades of Democratic Senate wins, sitting on top of a two-and-a-half-to-one cash advantage, a unanimous Likely-Democratic rater consensus, and a midterm wind against the president's party, is why six price-blind models all made the DFL the heavy favorite. — the panel consensus

Not every seat pushed to the same place, and the disagreement inside the panel is honest. Fable, Opus, and Sonnet sat at the top at 88%, closest to the market, trusting the uniform Democratic signal the most. GLM sat lowest at 82%, giving the most weight to the narrowed 2024 margin and open-seat uncertainty. That spread, 82 to 88 on the same fetched facts, is a judgment-call spread, not an information gap, and it is why the blend lands in the mid-80s rather than at the market's 95.

The Republican Side: The Narrow Path

The Republican here is not a live underdog the way an open-seat challenger is in a true swing state, but the panel still prices the side at about 14%, more than double its ~6-cent market and short of dismissed. The models are clear about where the slim path runs and why the market likes it even less than they do.

The strongest case for the Republican rests on three fetched facts the panel took seriously. First, the open seat itself: with no incumbent and neither party's nominee chosen until August 11, the structural advantage an incumbent would carry is simply absent, for both sides. Second, the narrowing top of the ticket: Minnesota went from D+7.1 in 2020 to D+4.2 in 2024, a real erosion even as the state stayed blue. Third, the polling caveat the panel kept flagging: every public head-to-head tests Michele Tafoya, not Adam Schwarze, the actual party-endorsed candidate, and the freshest nonpartisan numbers are months old, so the live margin is less certain than a single poll makes it look.

Why the models still kept the side far behind: the panel reads two decades of Democratic Senate wins and a run of double-digit margins as very hard to overcome in a single open cycle, and it respects the unanimous rating and the money gap. Kimi, sitting at 85% for the DFL, captured exactly why it would not go lower, noting that the recent seven-point leads come from a Democratic firm and that applying the card's partisan discount still leaves the live margin around D+4, a real edge rather than a coin flip. The models price a competitive-seeming number on the Republican line mostly because the seat is open and the nominee is unset, not because Minnesota looks ready to send a Republican back to this seat for the first time since Norm Coleman.

Where The Panel Changed Its Mind

After round one, five of the six seats read the others' anonymized reasoning and could revise. Most held, and one moved toward the cluster, and the arcs are worth reading because they show exactly which argument carried weight.

• GLM Revised Up, 75% To 82% For The DFL. It was the panel's outlier in round one, and reading the others moved it: "I revised upward from 75% after weighing two factors more heavily than in round 1. First, the 2024 Senate result demonstrates that Minnesota Senate races materially outperform the presidential margin — Klobuchar's +15.7 in a year where Harris won by only +4.2 suggests the structural floor for a DFL candidate is higher than a bare presidential read implies." That single argument, that Minnesota's Senate results run well ahead of its top-of-ticket lean, is the one that pulled the low seat up. — GLM
• Opus Held At 88%, And Said Why. "Unanimous Likely-D ratings, a hardened D+4-7 lean, a 2.5:1 DFL cash advantage, and consistent mid-single-digit polling leads — all pushed the same direction by an out-party midterm environment — outweigh open-seat and primary-timing uncertainty, which affects candidate identity but not party outcome." — Opus
• Kimi Held At 85%, And Explained The Discipline Behind It. It judged the fundamentals "unchanged and uniformly pro-DFL," noting that both DFL frontrunners lead Tafoya across every public head-to-head (by margins ranging from about three to seven points), that "midterm-era polls have been nearly unbiased (2018: -0.3, 2022: +0.9), so no large correction is warranted," and that "the money gap is structural, not cyclical." — Kimi

The net effect on the headline was small, the blend moved up by about a point as GLM converged toward the group, which is itself the finding: reading each other's reasoning tightened the panel rather than scattering it. Six price-blind models landed between 82 and 88 on the DFL side after the revision round, a stable, well-argued cluster rather than a single forced number.

What Would Change The Panel's Mind

This is a board with a calendar in front of it, and several concrete events could move the number in a known direction:

• The August 11 Primary Result. The party market does not move on who wins, but the competitiveness does. If Michele Tafoya wins the GOP nomination, the general has the one Republican who has actually polled within single digits, and the panel's Republican number likely firms. If Adam Schwarze or another candidate wins, no public poll has ever tested that matchup, and the Republican number carries even more uncertainty.
• A Fresh Nonpartisan Poll. The newest independent head-to-head is months old. A new Emerson or Quinnipiac-class poll showing the DFL lead back into double digits pushes the Democratic side toward the market; one showing it inside three or four points pushes the Republican side up.
• The National Environment. A sharp drop in the Republican administration's standing deepens the midterm wind and pushes the DFL side up. A rally-around-the-flag national event, the kind that flipped the 1998 and 2002 midterms against the usual pattern, would cut the other way.
• The Q3 Fundraising Picture (mid-October Filings). If national Republican money decides Minnesota is worth contesting and reserves heavily here, the Republican number firms. If the DFL's roughly two-and-a-half-to-one edge widens further, the Democratic number does.

Dark Horses The Panel Won't Dismiss

The named board is two-way, but the fetched record and the settlement mechanic leave a few scenarios the panel flagged rather than ignored:

• A Nominee Mismatch On The Republican Side. The entire competitive read on the Republican line is shaped by Tafoya, the only Republican ever tested against the DFL. If the endorsed Schwarze is the nominee instead, the race runs with no polling anchor at all, and the true number could sit on either side of the panel's 14%, the direction depending on how a first-time statewide candidate wears in a general.
• The Narrowing Is Real And Accelerating. Every Republican-side argument leans on Minnesota's 2024 slippage from D+7 to D+4. If that erosion is a trend rather than a one-cycle dip, and it shows up in a fresh poll, the 6-cent Republican contract is closer to underpriced than the market's near-lock implies, and the panel's 14% would look conservative.
• The Party-Not-Person Settlement Tail. Because these contracts pay on party, a third-party or independent winner, or a party switch before the January 2027 swearing-in, would resolve both the DFL and Republican markets to No. This is a negligible outcome in a two-major-party Minnesota race, but it is why neither contract tracks any named candidate directly.

The Traps: Rows That Look Like Signal But Are Not

Transparency matters more than a clean story, so here is where the board could mislead you:

• A 95-Cent Price Is Not A Called Result, And 14% Is Not A Real Threat. The market's near-lock is easy to read as "over," and the panel's 14% is easy to read as "the Republican has a live shot." Neither is quite right: the panel's thesis is a strong Democratic hold with the ordinary uncertainty of an open, pre-primary seat, not a race the Republican is likely to win. The gap between 95 and 86 is about confidence, not about who is favored.
• A Single Poll Is Stale, And A Partisan Poll Is Discounted. The DFL leads every head-to-head, which is easy to read as a lock. But the freshest nonpartisan numbers are from February, and the newest leads come from a Democratic firm, so the panel treated the live margin as narrower and less certain than the toplines. Do not read a months-old plus-seven as today's number.
• The Unset Primary Cuts Both Ways. No public poll tests the endorsed Republican, Adam Schwarze, in a general. Reading the Republican side as a firm 14% before either nominee is chosen is its own small leap, and August 11 is its first real test.

How To Read This Board

The board sorts into three honest reads, and which one fits depends on how much weight you put on the structural wall versus the open-seat uncertainty.

• You Trust The Structure: The Near-Safe Democratic Read. Two decades without a Republican Senate win, a run of double-digit DFL Senate margins, a two-and-a-half-to-one cash advantage, a unanimous Likely-Democratic rater consensus, and a midterm wind against the president's party are the case for the market's 95-cent price.
• You Trust The Uncertainty: The Panel's Discount. An open seat with no incumbent, a primary not yet held, a 2024 margin that narrowed to about four points, and a polling record that never tested the actual GOP nominee are why the panel prices the Republican near 14% and reads the 6-cent market as a touch too low.
• You Want The Honest Bottom Line: A Heavy Democratic Favorite The Market Prices A Little Safer Than The Models Do. The forecasters rate it Likely Democratic, the market treats it as near-safe, and our panel treats it as a strong-but-not-locked hold. The interesting thing is not the favorite, both agree on that, but the size of the cushion, and it settles in public in November.

How To Read These Prices

The models can tell you where they part ways with the crowd, but the number in front of you still has to be understood in context. Here is how to read a market like this one, plus the honest friction of an event-driven board.

Work an example. Say the DFL contract shows a 95-cent YES price. Taken at face value, that implies about a 95% chance a Democrat wins the seat. To get a fair, spread-free read you normalize the whole field so every outcome's price sums to 100. On most prediction-market boards the raw prices sum to more than 100 because each contract carries its own bid/ask spread, and de-vigging pulls the numbers back toward a clean total. This board is a clean two-way that already sums to about 100, so there is almost nothing to remove, and 95 for the DFL stays near 95%. The lesson holds anyway: always check what a fair version of a price looks like before comparing it to anything, which is the whole idea behind converting Kalshi's cents into real odds before leaning on any number.

That same discipline of comparing a number to its fair value is what line shopping and finding the +EV side is about. OddsShopper's odds screen and free expert picks cover the sports slate rather than election futures, and the Minnesota race itself lives on Kalshi, but the method is the same one our New Hampshire Senate model verdict, our Georgia Senate model verdict, and our Maine Senate model verdict use on related fields, and it complements our broader 2026 Senate election odds breakdown of the whole chamber. Every number here also lands in our back-tested Model Verdict ledger.

A few honest points before reading too much into any number in the table above:

• Eligibility. Kalshi is a CFTC-regulated event-contract exchange, not a sportsbook. You must be 18 or older and located in an eligible state, and availability varies by state and can change.
• Liquidity And Spread. This is a quiet, long-dated board: its live two-sided quote was thin at the snapshot and open interest was not reported, so the prices here come from recent daily-candle closes rather than a continuous tight bid/ask. Treat the exact cents as indicative, and expect your fill to depend on the spread at the moment you act.
• A Moving Story. This race has an unset primary, a narrowing state lean, and an election three months out; new events before November 3 can move it, and these estimates reflect only what was known on August 8. Prices shown on this page refresh as the story moves toward November.
• Not Advice. Everything here is analysis for information, not a recommendation to trade or to vote. These are model estimates, not predictions of fact and not financial or voting advice.

Settlement Timeline

Settlement	Resolves when the winner is sworn in as Minnesota's Class 2 senator for the term beginning in 2027 (early close on swearing-in, around January 2027); effectively decided by the November 3, 2026 general election
Next Catalysts	August 11, 2026 state primaries (sets both nominees); fall 2026 debates; mid-October Q3 FEC filings; November 3, 2026 general election
Re-Score Policy	We re-score this board when the story moves: a primary result, a new poll, a debate, or a rating change. As of August 8, 2026, the panel sits at DFL 86% / Republican 14%, against a market of DFL 95¢ / Republican 6¢

FAQ

Who is favored to win the 2026 Minnesota Senate race? Both the market and our AI panel favor the Democratic (DFL) side, but by very different amounts. Kalshi's market prices the DFL contract near 95 cents and the Republican side near 6, treating the open seat as close to safe for the Democrats. Our price-blind, six-model panel is more cautious, blending the DFL side to about 86 percent and the Republican side to about 14. Both agree the DFL is the clear favorite; they split on how safe it is.

When is the 2026 Minnesota primary and who is running for Senate? Minnesota's state primary is August 11, 2026, and the general election is November 3, 2026. On the DFL side, Lieutenant Governor Peggy Flanagan holds the party endorsement and U.S. Representative Angie Craig leads the field in fundraising; MPR News has described the top tier as a coin flip. On the Republican side, former Navy SEAL Adam Schwarze won the party endorsement, while broadcaster Michele Tafoya leads the GOP field in money and is the only Republican tested in general-election polling. Because the Kalshi contract settles on party, the primary result does not change what the market resolves on.

Why does the AI panel disagree with the market on this race? The market prices Minnesota's deep Democratic lean, a two-decade run of Democratic Senate wins, and a roughly two-and-a-half-to-one DFL fundraising edge as close to decisive, pushing the Democratic side up near 95 cents. The panel weights all of that too, but leans harder on the fact that this is an open seat with no incumbent, that the August 11 primaries have not been held so neither nominee is settled, and that Minnesota's 2024 presidential margin narrowed to about four points. On that weight the panel keeps the DFL side near 86 percent rather than a near-lock.

Has Minnesota ever elected a Republican to the U.S. Senate recently? Yes, though not since 2002. The last Republican to win a Minnesota U.S. Senate race was Norm Coleman in 2002, and Coleman held this exact Class 2 seat from 2003 to 2009 before losing it to Al Franken by 312 votes in the 2008 recount, one of the closest Senate elections in U.S. history. So this is not a seat Republicans have never held; no Republican has simply won a Minnesota Senate race in the more than two decades since, and the state's Democratic lean has hardened, which is a big reason the market prices the DFL side so heavily.

How does the Kalshi Minnesota Senate market settle? Kalshi lists one yes/no contract per party. The Democratic (DFL) contract resolves YES if a Democrat is sworn in as Minnesota's Class 2 senator for the term beginning in 2027, and the Republican contract resolves YES if a Republican is. It pays on the winner's party, not the named candidate, so a third-party or independent winner, or a party switch before swearing-in, would resolve both markets to No.

How were these model estimates produced? Six AI models scored the race without seeing any market prices, working from a fetched, dated summary of the candidates, the August primary picture, race ratings, structural voting history, fundraising, and the live head-to-head polls, then read one another's anonymized reasoning and revised. Their numbers were blended into one estimate per party. These are model estimates, not predictions of fact and not financial or voting advice.

The Bottom Line

The market and the models are looking at the same race and agreeing on the favorite while splitting on the margin, which is what makes this board worth reading. Kalshi prices the DFL side near 95 cents and the Republican near 6, treating the seat as close to safe, on two decades without a Republican Senate win, a run of double-digit DFL margins, a two-and-a-half-to-one cash edge, and a unanimous Likely-Democratic rating. Our panel keeps the DFL at about 86 percent and the Republican at about 14 on the weight of an open seat, a primary that has not happened, a 2024 margin that narrowed to about four points, and a polling record that never tested the actual GOP nominee. The read to take is not that the Republican is live, and not that the seat is called, but that a strong Democratic hold in an unsettled open seat is not quite the same as a 95-cent lock, which is why six price-blind models priced the Republican side above its market. If this method is your thing, our New Hampshire Senate model verdict and our guide to Kalshi versus Polymarket are the natural next reads.

Hottest Prediction Markets Right Now

• 2028 Democratic presidential nominee · $166M traded
• Rocket Classic Winner · $124M traded
• 2027 Pro Football Champion · $51M traded
• Pro Baseball Champion · $40M traded
• Bitcoin price at the end of 2026 · $30M traded
• 2027 Pro Basketball Champion · $19M traded

Every market above links to our full AI model verdict; browse them all on the OddsShopper prediction markets hub, and see how every settled call actually scored on the full graded scoreboard.