The Quick Answer
Kalshi's MLS Cup 2026 board makes Inter Miami CF the clear favorite at 29 cents, nearly double the price of any other club. Eight AI models scored all 30 clubs without being shown a single price, working from a season ledger fetched the morning of August 3, and came back with a different board: Nashville SC narrowly first at 12.8%, Inter Miami second at 12.2%, Vancouver Whitecaps at 9.9% and LAFC at 9.2%. Not one of the eight seats put Miami above 15.2%. After adjusting for the market's overround, that leaves Miami roughly 14 points richer than the panel thinks it should be, the widest disagreement anywhere on the board. The full 30-club table, the four clubs trading at two cents or less that the panel refuses to write off, and every seat's individual number are below.
New to Kalshi event markets? Start with our guide to sports contracts before reading the board. If you would rather see what our analysts like across every sport today, the free expert picks today page is open to everyone, and the live odds screen shows how the same soccer matches are priced across every major book.
The Board
Prices are Kalshi last-trade values as of August 3, 2026, 11:52 UTC. The De-Vigged column matters here: the 30 contracts' midpoints sum to about 110 cents rather than 100, so raw cents overstate every club's implied chance by roughly a tenth. The de-vigged figure is the honest comparison against the panel, and it is the number the Gap column uses.
| Club | Conference / Record | Market | De-Vigged | Panel Blend | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nashville SC | East 1 (40 pts in 18) | 12¢ | 10.5% | 12.8% | +2.3 |
| Inter Miami CF | East 2 (38 pts in 18) | 29¢ | 26.8% | 12.2% | -14.6 |
| Vancouver Whitecaps | West 1 (34 pts in 17) | 15¢ | 12.3% | 9.9% | -2.4 |
| LAFC | West 2 (34 pts in 19) | 13¢ | 12.3% | 9.2% | -3.1 |
| San Jose Earthquakes | West 3 (33 pts in 18) | 2¢ | 3.2% | 6.3% | +3.1 |
| Houston Dynamo FC | West 4 (29 pts in 17) | 2¢ | 1.4% | 5.5% | +4.1 |
| New England Revolution | East 3 (30 pts in 17) | 2¢ | 1.4% | 5.1% | +3.7 |
| Chicago Fire FC | East 4 (29 pts in 17) | 6¢ | 5.0% | 4.3% | -0.7 |
| St. Louis CITY SC | West 7 (26 pts in 18) | 1¢ | 1.4% | 3.7% | +2.3 |
| FC Dallas | West 6 (27 pts in 18) | 1¢ | 0.5% | 3.2% | +2.7 |
| Real Salt Lake | West 5 (27 pts in 17) | 1¢ | 1.4% | 3.1% | +1.7 |
| FC Cincinnati | East 6 (26 pts in 18) | 4¢ | 3.2% | 3.1% | -0.1 |
| New York City FC | East 5 (26 pts in 18) | 4¢ | 3.2% | 2.9% | -0.3 |
| Portland Timbers | West 8 (24 pts in 18) | 1¢ | 0.5% | 2.1% | +1.6 |
| Charlotte FC | East 7 (25 pts in 18) | 2¢ | 1.4% | 2.1% | +0.7 |
| Red Bull New York | East 8 (25 pts in 18) | 1¢ | 0.5% | 1.9% | +1.4 |
| D.C. United | East 9 (23 pts in 18) | 1¢ | 0.5% | 1.6% | +1.1 |
| Seattle Sounders FC | West 9 (24 pts in 17) | 4¢ | 3.2% | 1.5% | -1.7 |
| Minnesota United FC | West 10 (24 pts in 18) | 2¢ | 1.4% | 1.4% | +0.0 |
| Colorado Rapids | West 11 (22 pts in 18) | 1¢ | 0.5% | 1.2% | +0.7 |
| San Diego FC | West 13 (21 pts in 18) | 1¢ | 1.4% | 1.2% | -0.2 |
| LA Galaxy | West 12 (22 pts in 19) | 1¢ | 1.4% | 1.2% | -0.2 |
| Orlando City SC | East 10 (20 pts in 18) | 4¢ | 3.2% | 1.0% | -2.2 |
| Columbus Crew | East 11 (20 pts in 18) | 1¢ | 0.5% | 0.9% | +0.4 |
| Philadelphia Union | East 13 (16 pts in 18) | 2¢ | 1.4% | 0.6% | -0.8 |
| Toronto FC | East 12 (17 pts in 18) | 1¢ | 0.5% | 0.5% | +0.0 |
| CF Montréal | East 14 (16 pts in 18) | 1¢ | 0.5% | 0.5% | +0.0 |
| Austin FC | West 14 (17 pts in 18) | 1¢ | 0.5% | 0.4% | -0.1 |
| Atlanta United FC | East 15 (12 pts in 18) | 1¢ | 0.5% | 0.3% | -0.2 |
| Sporting Kansas City | West 15 (14 pts in 18) | 1¢ | 0.5% | 0.3% | -0.2 |
These are model estimates, not predictions of fact and not financial advice.
A Worked Example: What 29 Cents Actually Implies
The de-vig step is worth doing once by hand, because it changes the size of the story.
Each of the 30 contracts on this event is a separate Yes/No market, and each one resolves Yes if that club is the 2026 MLS Cup Champion, settling after the title holder is declared. Inter Miami's contract shows a 29-cent bid and a 30-cent ask, so its midpoint is 29.5 cents. Read naively, that is a 29.5% chance.
But add up all 30 midpoints and you get about 110 cents, not 100. That extra 10 cents is the overround, the cushion built into a book of mutually exclusive contracts. To get the market's actual implied probability, divide each midpoint by that total: 29.5 / 110 = 26.8%. Do the same for Nashville and its 12-cent price becomes 10.5% rather than 11.5%.
That matters for how you describe the disagreement. Against the raw 29 cents, the panel's 12.2% looks like a 17-point gap. Against the de-vigged 26.8%, it is 14.6 points. Still more than three times any other gap on the board, but the honest version is the smaller one. If you want the mechanics in more depth, we wrote a full guide to what a Kalshi price actually means.
The same arithmetic is why penny contracts on this board should be read loosely. A club quoted 0 bid / 1 ask has a midpoint of half a cent, and a club quoted 1 bid / 2 ask has a midpoint of 1.5 cents. That is a threefold difference in implied probability created entirely by where a thin book happens to be quoted, not by anything about the football.
Two things stand out before any club-by-club argument. The first is that the market's four-club top tier and the panel's four-club top tier contain exactly the same names, in a different order. The second is that the market compresses everything below that tier into pennies, while the panel spreads real probability across the next six clubs. On a board where 18 of 30 teams reach the playoffs and the champion must survive four knockout rounds, the panel's flatter shape is the more defensible one.
Inter Miami CF: The Board's Biggest Disagreement
At 29 cents, Inter Miami is priced at more than twice what Nashville SC is, and the panel does not see it. All eight seats landed between 10.7% and 15.2%, a tight band nowhere near the market. The models were not shown the price, so this is not eight machines arguing with a number on a screen; it is eight independent reads of the same season landing in the same place.
The case for the price is real. Miami has the league's best attack at 45 goals, the best form of any club over its last ten matches at 23 points, and it is the reigning champion, having beaten Vancouver 3-1 at Chase Stadium on December 6, 2025. It sits second in the East at 38 points from 18 matches.
The case against it is specific, and it turns on one number that several seats found independently. Miami has taken 13 points from its 8 home matches and 25 points from its 10 away matches. That is the weakest home record of the four clubs the market prices in double digits, and it is the profile that this particular tournament punishes hardest. Claude Opus, which had ranked Miami first in the opening round, moved it down after working through why:
In this format the entire prize of a top seed is hosting, and Miami's own 2026 ledger says it is the league's worst-converting home side among contenders: 13 points from 8 home matches versus 25 from 10 away. A team that banks its points on the road is being handed the one advantage it demonstrably does not exploit, and the conference semifinal, conference final and MLS Cup are all single matches at the higher seed's ground. — Claude Opus
[Editor's note: hosting is the largest prize of a top seed, not the only one. The top seed also draws the wild-card winner in Round One rather than a 2-through-7 opponent.]
Opus also declined to lean on it too hard, noting the split is a half-season sample distorted by fixture ordering and the six-week World Cup gap, and regressed it rather than treating it as settled. Kimi reached the same ranking by a different route, pointing at Miami's 32 goals against, the worst defensive mark in the top tier, as the thing that adds upset risk in every single-match round. Gemini went the other way and made Miami its top pick at 13.5%, arguing that elite away form is a proxy for tactical resilience in knockout football. Even that bull case sits less than half the market price.
Nashville SC: The Model's Favorite, And Why It Isn't Obvious
Nashville SC leads the Eastern Conference with 40 points from 18 matches, and it does so on the strength of a defense that has conceded 14 goals, the fewest in MLS. Its goal difference of +21 is tied for the league's best. It has taken 25 points from 9 home matches. In a bracket where the top seed hosts every single-match round inside its own conference, that is the trait with the most direct cash value.
Six of the eight seats made Nashville their top pick after the revision round. GLM put the mechanism plainly:
Their league-best defense is the most playoff-sustainable trait on the board. Defense travels in single-elimination knockouts better than attack. Home dominance means they likely host through the conference final. — GLM
The market has Nashville at 12 cents, which de-vigs to about 10.5%, slightly below the panel's 12.8%. This is the quieter half of the Miami story. The panel is not wildly bullish on Nashville in absolute terms. It simply refuses to make anyone a runaway favorite, and once Miami comes down, Nashville is what is left at the top.
Vancouver Whitecaps And LAFC: The West's Two-Horse Problem
Vancouver and LAFC are level on 34 points, and the panel has them within a point of each other at 9.9% and 9.2%. They arrive there differently. Vancouver has played two fewer matches and shares the league's best goal difference at +21, but its recent form has cooled to 16 points from its last ten with a LWLDD run. LAFC has the steadier profile and 22 points from 10 home matches, but a weaker away record at 12 points from 9.
This pair produced the panel's most interesting revision. Claude Sonnet had Vancouver as a co-favorite in round one and moved Miami above it after re-checking its own arithmetic:
Recalculating points-per-game pace, Nashville 2.22, Miami 2.11, Vancouver only 2.00, plus Vancouver's cooling recent form versus Miami's hot stretch, shows I over-weighted Vancouver's goal-difference parity with Nashville and under-weighted pace and form. This wasn't peer-conformity: every other forecaster independently ranked Miami at or above Vancouver, which prompted me to check my own math. — Claude Sonnet
GPT moved the other way in the same round, lifting Vancouver above LAFC on the games-in-hand argument. Both clubs sit meaningfully below their market prices in the final blend, which is the same effect as the Miami gap in milder form: the market is paying up for the top of the Western table, and the panel is not.
The Base Rate That Caps Everyone
Every seat, unprompted by any instruction to agree, converged on the same ceiling, and all of them cited the same fact. Across the 30 MLS Cup finals played from 1996 through 2025, the Supporters' Shield winner went on to win MLS Cup eight times. That is 27%, and it is the single most disciplining number on this board.
The reason is structural rather than statistical. Reaching the playoffs in MLS is close to a formality for a good team: 18 of 30 clubs qualify. Winning them is not. A champion must take a best-of-three series and then three consecutive single-match eliminations, four if it comes through the wild-card round. Single matches compress talent gaps in a way a 34-game table never does. Extra time and penalties decide any of them that stay level from the conference semifinals onward.
Recent history says the same thing in plainer language. Inter Miami won the 2025 title as the East's third seed, not its first. San Diego FC took the West's top seed that year and lost the conference final, and it currently sits 13th in the West on 21 points. In 2024 Inter Miami won the Shield and the LA Galaxy won the Cup. Regular-season dominance and December trophies come apart in this league more often than they line up, and a board that prices any single club near 30% is quietly taking the other side of that history.
Dark Horses The Panel Won't Dismiss
The market prices four clubs at two cents or less that the panel scores above 3.5%. Note that penny contracts are noisy by construction, since one cent is the minimum tick and the bid-ask spread on a thin book can be the whole price. Still, the direction is consistent across all eight seats.
Houston Dynamo FC, 2 cents, panel 5.5%. Joint third-best form in MLS over its last ten matches at 20 points, behind only Inter Miami's 23 and Nashville's 21, on a WDDWW run, sitting fourth in the West on 29 points from 17. Its 19 points from 9 home matches suit the format. Gemini and GLM both raised Houston in the revision round after peers flagged the form.
San Jose Earthquakes, 2 cents, panel 6.3%. Third in the West on 33 points with a +13 goal difference and 19 points from 9 away matches, the second-best road record in the league. The panel scores it well above its price despite acknowledging it is cooling, at 12 points from its last ten. Houston's +4.1 is the board's largest positive gap; San Jose's +3.1 is third.
New England Revolution, 2 cents, panel 5.1%. Third in the East on 30 points, with 25 points from 10 home matches. It is also the sharpest trap on this list: New England has 5 points from 7 away matches. Kimi promoted it anyway, on the reasoning that the away flaw matters far less if the club holds a top-three seed and hosts every round it survives.
St. Louis CITY SC, 1 cent, panel 3.7%. Seventh in the West on 26 points but on a WWWWD run and 20 points from its last ten, one of only four clubs in the league at 20 or more points over that span.
Where The Panel Splits
Consensus is not uniform, and the rows where seats diverge are worth more than the rows where they agree.
Claude Sonnet ran hotter than the field at the top, at 16.2% on Nashville and 15.2% on Miami, and correspondingly colder on the mid-table. DeepSeek was the only seat to put Vancouver level with Miami at 11.0%. Sonnet also gave Houston 7.9% against a field that mostly sat near 5%. Gemini alone made Miami its outright top pick.
The clubs where all eight seats effectively agree are the bottom of the board: Sporting Kansas City on 14 points with a -28 goal difference, and Atlanta United on 12 points, both scored at 0.3%. Neither is a disagreement worth acting on. The rows that carry information are the ones where the market and a unanimous panel point in opposite directions, and on this board that is Miami above all.
Every Seat's Number
Each model scored all 30 clubs in a single pass, so its numbers describe one coherent view of the season rather than 30 unrelated guesses. None was shown a market price at any point. After the first round, every seat read the other seven's reasoning with the authors anonymized and could revise. The figures below are the post-revision numbers, and both rounds are stored for public grading.
| Club | Claude Fable | Claude Opus | Claude Sonnet | GPT | Gemini | GLM | Kimi | DeepSeek | Blend | Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nashville SC | 13.3 | 12.0 | 16.2 | 11.7 | 13.0 | 11.7 | 12.5 | 12.0 | 12.8 | 12¢ |
| Inter Miami CF | 13.3 | 11.5 | 15.2 | 10.7 | 13.5 | 10.7 | 12.0 | 11.0 | 12.2 | 29¢ |
| Vancouver Whitecaps | 9.2 | 9.0 | 10.5 | 9.7 | 10.5 | 10.7 | 9.0 | 11.0 | 9.9 | 15¢ |
| LAFC | 9.2 | 10.0 | 9.4 | 8.7 | 9.5 | 8.7 | 8.0 | 10.0 | 9.2 | 13¢ |
| San Jose Earthquakes | 6.2 | 6.0 | 6.3 | 5.8 | 6.0 | 5.8 | 6.0 | 8.0 | 6.3 | 2¢ |
| Houston Dynamo FC | 5.1 | 5.5 | 7.9 | 5.3 | 6.0 | 4.9 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 5.5 | 2¢ |
| New England Revolution | 5.1 | 6.0 | 4.7 | 4.9 | 5.0 | 3.9 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 5.1 | 2¢ |
| Chicago Fire FC | 5.1 | 5.0 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 3.9 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 4.3 | 6¢ |
| St. Louis CITY SC | 4.1 | 4.0 | 3.1 | 4.4 | 5.0 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.7 | 1¢ |
| FC Dallas | 3.1 | 4.0 | 3.1 | 3.9 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 3.2 | 1¢ |
| Real Salt Lake | 3.1 | 3.5 | 3.7 | 3.9 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 3.1 | 1¢ |
| FC Cincinnati | 3.6 | 3.5 | 2.6 | 2.9 | 4.0 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 3.1 | 4¢ |
| New York City FC | 3.1 | 3.0 | 2.6 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 2.9 | 4¢ |
| Portland Timbers | 2.6 | 2.5 | 1.4 | 2.7 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 1¢ |
Every seat on this panel is graded against real market settlements — records to date: Gemini 85% on 1,718 graded calls · GPT 83% on 1,693 graded calls · Claude Opus 86% on 382 graded calls · Claude Sonnet 84% on 363 graded calls · Claude Fable 85% on 331 graded calls · GLM 80% on 1,874 graded calls · Kimi 84% on 1,863 graded calls · DeepSeek 80% on 1,877 graded calls. Recomputed daily; the full scoreboard is public.
These are model estimates, not predictions of fact and not financial advice.
Every number in this piece gets graded in public once the market settles. The full graded scoreboard tracks every call this panel has made.
The Complete 30-Club Board
| Club | Conference | Pts / GP | GD | Last 5 | Market | Panel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nashville SC | Eastern | 40 / 18 | +21 | WWWLD | 12¢ | 12.8% |
| Inter Miami CF | Eastern | 38 / 18 | +13 | WWWWD | 29¢ | 12.2% |
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Western | 34 / 17 | +21 | LWLDD | 15¢ | 9.9% |
| LAFC | Western | 34 / 19 | +16 | WWWWD | 13¢ | 9.2% |
| San Jose Earthquakes | Western | 33 / 18 | +13 | LWLDL | 2¢ | 6.3% |
| Houston Dynamo FC | Western | 29 / 17 | +1 | WDDWW | 2¢ | 5.5% |
| New England Revolution | Eastern | 30 / 17 | +7 | WLDWD | 2¢ | 5.1% |
| Chicago Fire FC | Eastern | 29 / 17 | +9 | WWLLW | 6¢ | 4.3% |
| St. Louis CITY SC | Western | 26 / 18 | 0 | WWWWD | 1¢ | 3.7% |
| FC Dallas | Western | 27 / 18 | +7 | WWDLD | 1¢ | 3.2% |
| Real Salt Lake | Western | 27 / 17 | +4 | WDLLD | 1¢ | 3.1% |
| FC Cincinnati | Eastern | 26 / 18 | +1 | DWWLW | 4¢ | 3.1% |
| New York City FC | Eastern | 26 / 18 | +7 | DLWWD | 4¢ | 2.9% |
| Portland Timbers | Western | 24 / 18 | 0 | LWDWW | 1¢ | 2.1% |
| Charlotte FC | Eastern | 25 / 18 | +2 | WWDWL | 2¢ | 2.1% |
| Red Bull New York | Eastern | 25 / 18 | -10 | DWLLW | 1¢ | 1.9% |
| D.C. United | Eastern | 23 / 18 | -3 | DDDWD | 1¢ | 1.6% |
| Seattle Sounders FC | Western | 24 / 17 | -2 | LLLLL | 4¢ | 1.5% |
| Minnesota United FC | Western | 24 / 18 | -5 | LDLDD | 2¢ | 1.4% |
| Colorado Rapids | Western | 22 / 18 | +2 | LLWLW | 1¢ | 1.2% |
| San Diego FC | Western | 21 / 18 | +3 | DLLWD | 1¢ | 1.2% |
| LA Galaxy | Western | 22 / 19 | -5 | DLLDD | 1¢ | 1.2% |
| Orlando City SC | Eastern | 20 / 18 | -17 | DLWWL | 4¢ | 1.0% |
| Columbus Crew | Eastern | 20 / 18 | -2 | DWLWD | 1¢ | 0.9% |
| Philadelphia Union | Eastern | 16 / 18 | -8 | DLWWW | 2¢ | 0.6% |
| Toronto FC | Eastern | 17 / 18 | -8 | LDDLD | 1¢ | 0.5% |
| CF Montréal | Eastern | 16 / 18 | -11 | DDLLD | 1¢ | 0.5% |
| Austin FC | Western | 17 / 18 | -14 | LLWLL | 1¢ | 0.4% |
| Atlanta United FC | Eastern | 12 / 18 | -14 | LLDLL | 1¢ | 0.3% |
| Sporting Kansas City | Western | 14 / 18 | -28 | LLWLL | 1¢ | 0.3% |
These are model estimates, not predictions of fact and not financial advice.
What Would Change This
The panel named its own blind spot without being asked. Six of the eight seats said it explicitly, and all eight named squad news as the thing most likely to move their numbers: the ledger they were given covers results, not squads. It carries every club's record, goal difference, home and away splits and full match-by-match log, and it deliberately carries no rosters, no injuries, no transfers and no news. The instruction was to reason from what happened on the field and to say so.
That is worth stating plainly because it is most of the gap. The market is partly pricing names, and this board has several: the panel was shown that Inter Miami has scored 45 goals, not who scored them. Whether that is the panel's weakness or its discipline is exactly what December will settle.
The specific items that would move these numbers, in the seats' own words, are a long-term injury to a talismanic attacker at Miami or Nashville, a significant summer signing at any of the top four, and the effect of the six-week World Cup break on squad cohesion over the run-in. There are 15 to 17 matches left for every club, so seeding is far from settled: Nashville's 40 points and Miami's 38 lead the East, but only 3 points separate the East's fifth and ninth places.
We will re-score this board when the playoff field is set in November, and we grade this call in public when MLS Cup is decided on December 18.
MLS Cup 2026 FAQ
When is MLS Cup 2026 and who hosts it?
MLS Cup 2026 is scheduled for December 18, 2026. The playoffs run from November 18 to December 18, following a regular season that runs February 21 to November 7. There is no neutral site: the wild-card round, conference semifinals, conference finals and MLS Cup itself are all single-match eliminations hosted by the team with the better regular-season record. That is why the race for the top seed carries so much weight on this board.
Who is the favorite to win MLS Cup 2026?
Kalshi's board makes Inter Miami CF the favorite at 29 cents as of August 3, 2026, ahead of Vancouver Whitecaps at 15 cents, LAFC at 13 cents and Nashville SC at 12 cents. An eight-model price-blind panel disagrees on the order: it makes Nashville SC the narrow pick at 12.8% with Inter Miami at 12.2%, Vancouver at 9.9% and LAFC at 9.2%.
How do the MLS Cup playoffs work?
The top nine clubs in each conference qualify, 18 of 30 in total. The eighth and ninth seeds meet in a single-match wild-card round, and the winner faces the top seed. All of Round One is played as best-of-three series, the top seed against that wild-card winner and the other six clubs seeded 2 v 7, 3 v 6 and 4 v 5, with the higher seed hosting the odd-numbered games and no re-seeding in any round. Conference semifinals, conference finals and MLS Cup are single-match eliminations.
Does the best regular-season team usually win MLS Cup?
No, and it is not close. Across the 30 MLS Cup finals played from 1996 through 2025, the Supporters' Shield winner, meaning the club with the league's best regular-season record, went on to win MLS Cup eight times. That is 27%. In 2025 the Shield went to the Philadelphia Union and the Cup went to Inter Miami; in 2024 the Shield went to Inter Miami and the Cup went to the LA Galaxy.
To Be Explicit
Kalshi is a CFTC-regulated event-contract exchange, open to users 18+, with availability that varies by state. The numbers above are model estimates, not predictions of fact and not financial advice, and no outcome here is certain. Contracts on this board are thin: several trade at a single cent with a wide spread, and the 30 midpoints sum to about 110 cents, meaning the raw prices carry an overround that any comparison has to strip out first. Treat this panel as one input among many.
Related reading: our UEFA Champions League 2027 model verdict applies the same price-blind panel to European club football, and how sports event contracts on Kalshi work covers how these contracts settle.
Hottest Prediction Markets Right Now
- 2028 Democratic presidential nominee · $168M traded
- 2028 U.S. Presidential Election winner? · $56M traded
- 2027 Pro Football Champion · $53M traded
- Pro Baseball Champion · $43M traded
- Bitcoin price at the end of 2026 · $30M traded
- 2027 Pro Basketball Champion · $20M traded
Every market above links to our full AI model verdict; browse them all on the OddsShopper prediction markets hub, and see how every settled call actually scored on the full graded scoreboard.
